UFO Review issue 10.pdf

The Truth is a bit constipated and won’t be popping out real soon

May 2005

Number 10

New Alien Autopsy Santilli

Footage Finally Released!!!!

In This Issue

As usual, your Editor squeaks . Page 3

Interview with Andy Thomas

The remarkable feature about this interview with Andy,

the leading voice of reason on the crop circle phenomenon

in the UK, are the amazing similarities between crop

circle and UFO investigations. Two peas in a pod. This is

an in depth look at the subject from a level headed and

sane point of view. Page 5

Sandpaper Files Page 21

As opposed to Filer’s Files.

Phoenix Lights documentary Page 24

A review of Dr. Lynne Kitei’s brilliant new documentary

on that “big event”.

The Strange Case of the Fallen Fragments

By Nick Redfern. The Mclean case of 1952.

Fact or fiction? Page 26

Ed Gehrman Interview

An extensive interview with Ed about his discovery

of the cameraman’s crash site which in turn is linked

in to the alien autopsy footage. Time for a revisionist

approach, methinks. Page 30

Alien Commercialisation Of Roswell

Excellent piece by Dennis G. Balthaser Page 46

UFO RECOGNITION PART 3 – UFO FEATURES

By William F. Hamilton. Third and final part

of the series of articles. Page 50

This Is The lake District Page 54

But not as you know it.

Unmasking The Disruptors in UFO/Conspiracy Research

(Part 1)

By James Bartley. Reader submitted article. Page 56

Unmasking The Disruptors in UFO/Conspiracy Research

(Part 2)

By Eve Lorgen. Reader submitted article. Page 61

An Interview with Kithra

The lady who writes for Review , speaks to Review. Page 71

Dr Roger Leir interview – The Story of Varginha

Dig the rant from yours truly at the beginning. An

extensive review of a very interesting case. Page 77

The Quantum Mechanisms of Pyrophosphate (ATP)

and Their Postulated Role in the Rise of Life”.

By Leo J. Baranski, Ph.D.

And why not! Well actually because most of you

won’t be able to read it. A “heavy” scientific paper,

it purports to show that as far back as the 60’s, NASA

knew life existed elsewhere other than on this planet.

The paper is presented by Roger Anderton. Page 85

Welcome

Late again. Oh well, best thing to do is to abandon deadlines and you’ll see us when

you see us. Ironically, issue 11 might not be far behind.

As is the way with these things, an underlying and continuing progression of thought

has brought me to a point where I have become convinced about the process that will

be used for introducing the Human race to the reality of alien life. Yes, I’ve cracked it

and I’m serious. It will be through the eventual announcement of life existing on Mars.

It’s really very obvious actually when you think about it, because that announcement

will come at some point, but it won’t be about Martians. It will be about microbes; life

that can only be seen under a microscope.

That isn’t the way of course that most of us would like it to be done. What we want is

drama, perhaps an unplanned event like the Phoenix Lights (assuming that was

unplanned) and the President of the United States being forced into making a

statement. That though we are unlikely to see. First we need to get comfortable with

the fact that something else with a pulse lives elsewhere other than here on earth and

small creepy crawlies are not too threatening to the general public. Then, gradually,

the debates start up and the process unwinds. It won’t be quick. And a small part of

that process will be the next Spielberg film War of the Worlds which is dripping in

irony. For many consider that Orson Welles’ radio adaptation in 1938 was partially

responsible for the mess we’re in right now with this subject.

Many disagree with what I’ve written above but in my bones I feel this is the way this

story of ours will unfurl.

For the last three or four years I have been setting myself a target of getting over to

the States to attend a conference I have one or two in mind and to see some old

friends. I set myself the goal of the latter part of the year and every time it comes

round I seem to find excuses for not going. It’s very depressing. I am determined to

get over this year.

As is the cyclical nature of these things, the debate about the Alien Autopsy footage

has resurfaced again in one or two places, and indeed, we carry an article in this

edition that draws heavily on the topic. I’m glad that things come round again because

it gives me the chance to refocus on something that I hadn’t looked at properly the

first time. I was easily swayed by the uproar the film generated when it first came out

and had long put it in a box in my mind labelled “probably fake”, but I had done that

on the backs of other people’s opinions. Now I feel differently about it. There’s no point

in pointing to various bits of analysis or things that people did or did not say at this

juncture; all the evidence that was ever likely to surface has done so and we need “the

next step” to take this any further. My point is that experts have contradicted each

other and countered each others points and Santilli has done his bit in answering

various questions and owning up to his misdemeanours. I don’t feel, looking at the

evidence out there that one can genuinely come to an objective decision about it. Most

people have arrived at their conclusions subjectively but aren’t honest or bright enough

to either recognise that or admit it. In fact, it would be an interesting study just to look

at the Ufological community’s reaction to the whole farrago purely because it not only

touched upon so many vested interests but also reached into the very souls of

ufologists in terms of what they wanted and what they expected when that great

moment arrived and they saw their first ever non terrestrial being. My own thoughts

have changed very rapidly over the last few weeks with this and I am now of the

opinion that the film itself is genuine. At this moment though, I’m only “soso” about

whether what we’re actually looking at really are aliens or something else. But this

subject isn’t going to go away.

As usual, this edition carries a wide range of subject matter and in particular, we step

into the topic of crop circles for the first time in a serious manner. Jenny Randles

appears to have got all this sorted out, or so she keeps telling everyone, ages ago

actually. I’m very pleased for her. I’ve not bothered to read what she’s written and

probably won’t. Difficult to take statements like that seriously and hence the folk

behind them.

My thanks to all this issues contributors.

It’s late Spring, the days are longer, we’ve already had the first lambing

season and the crops in the fields are starting to grow. As it’s the UK,

that can only mean one thing. It’s Crop Circle time.

Interview with Andy Thomas

Mention crop circles to any “serious” ufologist and if you get a reaction at all, it will be

the standard, “They’re all man made”. Or, they shift uncomfortably at the thought of

them because it brings to mind an image of mature baby boomers reliving their hippy

days with shades of the dreaded “New Ageism” thrown in. Serious ufologists care about

which thread screw fell of a particular alleged craft and in the background, there is

some vague awareness that crop circles equals “spirituality”, or, god forbid, thinking.

If you do read this, which of course you should, you will laugh your head off at the

similarities between the two sciences. Yes, sciences. The parallels are striking. Almost

the same problems, the same frustrations, the same difficulties.

So, methinks, if we are going to talk about crop circles in a semiserious ufological

publication, we might as well speak to someone who doesn’t talk bollocks and can

speak to us at a level we appreciate and interact with.

He may not agree but I regard Andy Thomas as the leading voice of Cereology,

certainly in the UK and probably within the top 5 in the world. How do I come to that

conclusion? I’ve read his books, or some of them, and was delighted to be confronted

by a sane, rational, readable, and very wry and amusing individual.

Andy has certainly had his moments. Now an integral part of the Glastonbury

Symposium, his lectures in the past have been anything but conventional, as you will

discover. He probably redefined the concept of the word as his audiences were verbally

and emotionally hit hard over the head with a figurative hammer, as he went about

making his various points.

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: