A. E. Van Vogt - The Best Of A. E. Van Vogt.pdf

(749 KB) Pobierz
59688922 UNPDF
“THE BEST OF ...” collections are intended to present the representative stories of the
masters of science fiction in chronological order, their aim being to provide science fiction
readers with a selection of short stories that demonstrate the authors’ literary
development and at the same time to provide new readers with a sound introduction to
their work.
The collections were compiled with the help and advice of the authors concerned,
together with the invaluable assistance of numerous fans, without whose good work, time
and patience they would not have been published.
In particular the advice of Roger Peyton, Gerald Bishop, Peter Weston and Leslie Flood
is appreciated.
ANGUS WELLS , Editor
 
Also in Sphere Books in the “Best of ...” seríes:
THE BEST OF ISAAC ASIMOV
THE BEST OF ARTHUR C. CLARKE
THE BEST OF JOHN WYNDHAM
THE BEST OF ROBERT HEINLEIN
THE BEST OF FRITZ LEIBER
THE BEST OF JOHN W. CAMPBELL
THE BEST OF FRANK HERBERT
THE BEST OF CLIFFORD D. SIMAK
 
The Best of
A. E. van Vogt
Volume 2
SPHERE BOOKS LIMITED
30/32 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8JL
 
First published in Great Britain by Sphere Books Ltd. as part of a single volume 1974
Copyright © A. E. van Vogt 1974
Anthology copyright © Sphere Books Ltd. 1974
Introduction copyright © A. E. van Vogt 1974
Bibliography copyright © Aardvark House 1974
TRADE
MARK
This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated
without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar
condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
Set in Monotype Times Roman
Printed in Great Britain by
Hazell Watson & Viney Ltd.
Aylesbury, Bucks
Contents
Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................... 6
Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 7
DEAR PEN PAL .............................................................................................................. 10
THE GREEN FOREST ..................................................................................................... 15
WAR OF NERVES .......................................................................................................... 30
THE EXPENDABLES ...................................................................................................... 44
SILKIES IN SPACE ........................................................................................................ 65
THE PROXY INTELLIGENCE ..................................................................................... 100
The Science Fiction Books of A. E. Van Vogt .................................................................. 133
About the e-Book ............................................................................................................ 136
Acknowledgments
Dear Pen Pal copyright © 1949 Arkham House
The Green Forest copyright © 1949 Street & Smith Pub-lications
War of Nerves copyright © 1950 Clark Publishing Co.
The Expendables copyright © 1963 Galaxy Publishing Co.
Silkies in Space copyright © 1966 Galaxy Publishing Co.
The Proxy Intelligence copyright © 1968 Galaxy Publishing Co.
59688922.001.png
Introduction
BEST ” is what is called in General Semantics a defining word. What this means is that the word of itself
implies a state, or level, of superiority in something.
But that, if you will think about it, is merely a value judgment of a person, a committee, or a group.
That is, it is an intellectual, or emotional, consideration. As such, it can never be an operational term.
So we are not surprised when, each year in the U.S.A. these days, half a dozen publishers issue
best-of-the-year science fiction. Worse, with a couple of well-advertised exceptions, none of the stories
in one “Best” is the same as those of any of the others.
Authors have lived with such contradictions with equa-nimity since the early days of SF.
Not too long ago, one of the best-of-that-year editors asked an SF writer if he had a story that had not
already been anthologized too often. Said author presently sent, along a story which he had selected
because, until then, it had only been printed in a collection of his own stories. The editor accepted it as
one of the best of the year without reading any of the other stories written by that author.
Now, it happened that the story which was submitted under these restricting requirements was the best
short story ever written by that author. That year it won the Hugo award of the World Science Fiction
Convention. None of the other “Best” editors had had the foresight to include it in their anthologies,
I have a lesser example from my own experience. Years ago, the editor of a magazine asked me to
select one of my stories for what was called an author’s choice of his own best story. The editor,
however, required that I limit my selection to a story printed in his magazine. The problem was he had
only published three of my stories.
Like most SF authors I handled this situation with the total aplomb of someone who realizes that failure
to make such a choice simply means your story is not included. P.S. I got the check.
Still--I should report--no one likes to be cynical.
Truth is, I have always had my own favorites among my stories, and occasionally re-read these.
Before I tell you my own choice, let me list for you those stories of mine which have repeatedly won
the accolade of my particular readership.
Short stories: (early titles) “Far Centaurus”, “Enchanted Village”, “The Monster”. This last has
sometimes been titled “Resurrection”, (more recent title) “Itself”.
Novelettes: (early titles) “Black Destroyer”, “Cooperate--Or Else”, The Weapon Shop”, (recent titles)
“The Proxy Intelligence”, “The Silkie”--novelette version--and “The Reflected Men”.
Novels: (early) Slan, The Voyage of the Space Beagle and The World of Null-A, (recent) Quest for
the Future and The Darkness on Diamondia.
Now, why are those not my choices also? Well, I like far-out science fiction.
Does far-out--you may wonder--mean unscientific? Does it mean that I have a fantasy orientation as
distinct from scientific extrapolation. Does it mean that I like it when an author creates bizarre but
impossible situations.
No--to all three questions.
Take “The Storm”--which I include in my list. Surely, at first look, some of the ideas in it are as
far-fetched as you could ask for. A “storm” in space. A planet revolving around the most fantastic sun in
the known universe: S-Doradus.
I’ll concentrate on that last item. When I got the idea, I wrote John W. Campbell, editor of
Astounding, and asked him if it was possible to obtain any valid concept of such a planet. What would
the sky look like? The plant life? etc. He wrote an astronomer friend. Among the three of us we evolved
the planet as described in the story. So far as I know it’s the only description in existence. And it’s
accurate.
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin