Ted Kosmatka - The Prophet of Flores.pdf - Ted Kosmatka - widez2

THE PROPHET OF FLORES

by Ted Kosmatka

Ted Kosmatka tells us he’s a lab rat from the north coast of Indiana. Since his

first sale to Asimov’s—”The God Engine” (October/November 2005)—his

stories have sold to both literary and science fiction markets. He has tales

forthcoming from Ideomancer and City Slab, and the play that he co-wrote,

Steel and Roses, has been performed in Illinois, Indiana, and New York City. You

can check out his website at www.tedkosmatka.com. Ted explores the

multiverse in his third story for us and finds a dangerous road not taken by our

own scientific revolution.

If this is the best of all possible worlds, what are the others like? —Voltaire

* * * *

When Paul was a boy, he played God in the attic above his parents’ garage. That’s

what his father called it, playing God, the day he found out. That’s what he called it

the day he smashed it all down.

Paul built the cages out of discarded two-by-fours he’d found behind the

garage, and quarter-inch mesh he bought from the local hardware store. While his

father was away speaking at a scientific conference on divine cladistics, Paul

began constructing his laboratory from plans he’d drawn during the last day of

school.

Because he wasn’t old enough to use his father’s power tools, he had to use

a handsaw to cut the wood for the cages. He used his mother’s sturdy black

scissors to snip the wire mesh. He borrowed hinges from old cabinet doors, and

he borrowed nails from the rusty coffee can that hung over his father’s unused

workbench.

One evening his mother heard the hammering and came out to the garage.

“What are you doing up there?” she asked, speaking in careful English, peering up

at the rectangle of light that spilled down from the attic.

Paul stuck his head through the opening, all spiky black hair and sawdust.

“I’m just playing around with some tools,” he said. Which was, in some sense, the

truth. Because he couldn’t lie to his mother. Not directly.

“Which tools?”

“Just a hammer and some nails.”

She stared up at him, her delicate face a broken Chinese doll—pieces of

porcelain re-glued subtly out of alignment. “Be careful,” she said, and he

understood she was talking both about the tools and about his father.

“I will.”

The days turned into weeks as Paul worked on the cages. Because the

materials were big, he built the cages big—less cutting that way. In reality, the

cages were enormous, over-engineered structures, ridiculously outsized for the

animals they’d be holding. They weren’t mouse cages so much as mouse

cities—huge tabletop-sized enclosures that could have housed German

Shepherds. He spent most of his paper route money on the project, buying odds

and ends that he needed: sheets of plexi, plastic water bottles, and small dowels

of wood he used for door latches. While the other children in the neighborhood

played basketball or wittedandu, Paul worked.

He bought exercise wheels and built walkways; he hung loops of yarn the

mice could climb to various platforms. The mice themselves he bought from a pet

store near his paper route. Most were white feeder mice used for snakes, but a

couple were of the more colorful, fancy variety. And there were even a few

English mice—sleek, long-bodied show mice with big tulip ears and glossy coats.

He wanted a diverse population, so he was careful to buy different kinds.

While he worked on their permanent homes, he kept the mice in little

aquariums stacked on a table in the middle of the room. On the day he finished

the last of the big cages, he released the mice into their new habitats one by

one—the first explorers on a new continent. To mark the occasion, he brought his

friend John over, whose eyes grew wide when he saw what Paul had made.

“You built all this?” John asked.

“Yeah.”

“It must have taken you a long time.”

“Months.”

“My parents don’t let me have pets.”

“Neither do mine,” Paul answered. “But anyway, these aren’t pets.”

“Then what are they?”

“An experiment.”

“What kind of experiment?”

“I haven’t figured that out yet.”

* * * *

Mr. Finley stood at the projector, marking a red ellipse on the clear plastic

sheet. Projected on the wall, it looked like a crooked half-smile between the X and

Y axis.

“This represents the number of daughter atoms. And this ...” He drew the

mirror image of the first ellipse. “This is the number of parent atoms.” He placed

the marker on the projector and considered the rows of students. “Can anyone

tell me what the point of intersection represents?”

Darren Michaels in the front row raised his hand. “It’s the element’s

half-life.”

“Exactly. Johnson, in what year was radiometric dating invented?”

“1906.”

“By whom?”

“Rutherford.”

“What method did he use?”

“Uranium lead—”

“No. Wallace, can you tell us?”

“He measured helium as an intermediate decay product of uranium.”

“Good, so then who used the uranium-lead method?”

“That was Boltwood, in 1907.”

“And how were these initial results viewed?”

“With skepticism.”

“By whom?”

“By the evolutionists.”

“Good.” Mr. Finley turned to Paul. “Carlson, can you tell us what year

Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species ?”

“1867, Paul said.”

“Yes, and in what year did Darwin’s theory finally lose the confidence of the

larger scientific community?”

“That was 1932.” Anticipating his next question, Paul continued. “When

Kohlhorster invented potassium-argon dating. The new dating method proved the

earth wasn’t as old as the evolutionists thought.”

“And in what year was the theory of evolution finally debunked

completely?”

“1954, when Willard F. Libby invented carbon-14 dating at the University of

Chicago. He won the Nobel prize in 1960 when he used carbon dating to prove,

once and for all, that the Earth was 5,800 years old.”

* * * *

Paul wore a white lab coat when he entered the attic. It was one of his

father’s old coats, so he had to cut the sleeves to fit his arms. Paul’s father was a

doctor, the Ph.D kind. He was blond and big and successful. He’d met Paul’s

mother after grad school while consulting for a Chinese research firm. They had

worked on the same projects for a while, but there was never any doubt that

Paul’s father was the bright light of the family. The genius, the famous man. He

was also crazy.

Paul’s father liked breaking things. He broke telephones, and he broke

walls, and he broke tables. He broke promises not to hit again. One time, he broke

bones; the police were called by the ER physicians who did not believe the story

about Paul’s mother falling down the stairs. They did not believe the weeping

woman of porcelain who swore her husband had not touched her.

Paul’s father was a force of nature, a cataclysm; as unpredictable as a

comet strike or a volcanic eruption. The attic was a good place to hide, and Paul

threw himself into his hobby.

Paul studied his mice as though they were Goodall’s chimps. He

documented their social interactions in a green spiral notebook. He found that,

within the large habitats, they formed packs like wolves, with a dominant male

and a dominant female—a structured social hierarchy involving mating privileges,

territory, and almost-ritualized displays of submission by males of lower rank. The

dominant male bred most of the females, and mice, Timothy learned, could kill

each other.

Nature abhors a vacuum, and the mouse populations expanded to fill the

new worlds he’d created for them. The babies were born pink and blind, but as

their fur came in, Paul began documenting colors in his notebook. There were

fawns, blacks, and grays. Occasional agoutis. There were Irish spotted, and

banded, and broken marked. In later generations, colors appeared that he hadn’t

purchased, and he knew enough about genetics to realize these were recessive

genes cropping up.

Paul was fascinated by the concept of genes, the stable elements through

which God provided for the transfer of heritable characteristics from one

generation to the next. In school they called it divine transmission.

Paul did research and found that the pigmentation loci of mice were

well-mapped and well-understood. He categorized his population by phenotype

and found one mouse, a pale, dark-eyed cream that must have been a triple

recessive: bb, dd, ee. But it wasn’t enough to just have them, to observe them, to

run the Punnett squares. He wanted to do real science. Because real scientists

used microscopes and electronic scales, Paul asked for these things for Christmas.

Mice, he quickly discovered, did not readily yield themselves to microscopy.

They tended to climb down from the stand. The electronic scale, however, proved

useful. He weighed every mouse and kept meticulous records. He considered

developing his own inbred strain—a line with some combination of distinctive

characteristics—but he wasn’t sure what characteristics to look for.

He was going over his notebook when he saw it. January-17. Not a date, but

a mouse—the seventeenth mouse born in January. He went to the cage and

opened the door. A flash of sandy fur, and he snatched it up by its tail—a brindle

Ted Kosmatka - The Prophet of Flores.pdf

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: