UFO Review issue 10.pdf
(
3611 KB
)
Pobierz
2567135 UNPDF
1
The Truth is a bit constipated and won’t be popping out real soon
May 2005
Number 10
New Alien Autopsy Santilli
Footage Finally Released!!!!
2
In This Issue
As usual, your Editor squeaks
.
Page 3
Interview with Andy Thomas
The remarkable feature about this interview with Andy,
the leading voice of reason on the crop circle phenomenon
in the UK, are the amazing similarities between crop
circle and UFO investigations. Two peas in a pod. This is
an in depth look at the subject from a level headed and
sane point of view. Page 5
Sandpaper Files
Page 21
As opposed to Filer’s Files.
Phoenix Lights documentary
Page 24
A review of Dr. Lynne Kitei’s brilliant new documentary
on that “big event”.
The Strange Case of the Fallen Fragments
By Nick Redfern. The Mclean case of 1952.
Fact or fiction? Page 26
Ed Gehrman Interview
An extensive interview with Ed about his discovery
of the cameraman’s crash site which in turn is linked
in to the alien autopsy footage. Time for a revisionist
approach, methinks. Page 30
Alien Commercialisation Of Roswell
Excellent piece by Dennis G. Balthaser Page 46
UFO RECOGNITION PART 3 – UFO FEATURES
By William F. Hamilton. Third and final part
of the series of articles. Page 50
This Is The lake District
Page 54
But not as you know it.
Unmasking The Disruptors in UFO/Conspiracy Research
(Part 1)
By James Bartley. Reader submitted article. Page 56
Unmasking The Disruptors in UFO/Conspiracy Research
(Part 2)
By Eve Lorgen. Reader submitted article. Page 61
An Interview with Kithra
The lady who writes for
Review
, speaks to
Review.
Page 71
Dr Roger Leir interview – The Story of Varginha
Dig the rant from yours truly at the beginning. An
extensive review of a very interesting case. Page 77
The Quantum Mechanisms of Pyrophosphate (ATP)
and Their Postulated Role in the Rise of Life”.
By Leo J. Baranski, Ph.D.
And why not! Well actually because most of you
won’t be able to read it. A “heavy” scientific paper,
it purports to show that as far back as the 60’s, NASA
knew life existed elsewhere other than on this planet.
The paper is presented by Roger Anderton. Page 85
3
Welcome
Late again. Oh well, best thing to do is to abandon deadlines and you’ll see us when
you see us. Ironically, issue 11 might not be far behind.
As is the way with these things, an underlying and continuing progression of thought
has brought me to a point where I have become convinced about the process that will
be used for introducing the Human race to the reality of alien life. Yes, I’ve cracked it
and I’m serious. It will be through the eventual announcement of life existing on Mars.
It’s really very obvious actually when you think about it, because that announcement
will come at some point, but it won’t be about Martians. It will be about microbes; life
that can only be seen under a microscope.
That isn’t the way of course that most of us would like it to be done. What we want is
drama, perhaps an unplanned event like the Phoenix Lights (assuming that
was
unplanned) and the President of the United States being forced into making a
statement. That though we are unlikely to see. First we need to get comfortable with
the fact that something else with a pulse lives elsewhere other than here on earth and
small creepy crawlies are not too threatening to the general public. Then, gradually,
the debates start up and the process unwinds. It won’t be quick. And a small part of
that process will be the next Spielberg film
War of the Worlds
which is dripping in
irony. For many consider that Orson Welles’ radio adaptation in 1938 was partially
responsible for the mess we’re in right now with this subject.
Many disagree with what I’ve written above but in my bones I feel this is the way this
story of ours will unfurl.
For the last three or four years I have been setting myself a target of getting over to
the States to attend a conference I have one or two in mind and to see some old
friends. I set myself the goal of the latter part of the year and every time it comes
round I seem to find excuses for not going. It’s very depressing. I am determined to
get over this year.
As is the cyclical nature of these things, the debate about the Alien Autopsy footage
has resurfaced again in one or two places, and indeed, we carry an article in this
edition that draws heavily on the topic. I’m glad that things come round again because
it gives me the chance to refocus on something that I hadn’t looked at properly the
first time. I was easily swayed by the uproar the film generated when it first came out
and had long put it in a box in my mind labelled “probably fake”, but I had done that
on the backs of other people’s opinions. Now I feel differently about it. There’s no point
in pointing to various bits of analysis or things that people did or did not say at this
juncture; all the evidence that was ever likely to surface has done so and we need “the
next step” to take this any further. My point is that experts have contradicted each
other and countered each others points and Santilli has done his bit in answering
various questions and owning up to his misdemeanours. I don’t feel, looking at the
evidence out there that one can genuinely come to an objective decision about it. Most
people have arrived at their conclusions subjectively but aren’t honest or bright enough
to either recognise that or admit it. In fact, it would be an interesting study just to look
at the Ufological community’s reaction to the whole farrago purely because it not only
touched upon so many vested interests but also reached into the very souls of
4
ufologists in terms of what they wanted and what they expected when that great
moment arrived and they saw their first ever non terrestrial being. My own thoughts
have changed very rapidly over the last few weeks with this and I am now of the
opinion that the film itself is genuine. At this moment though, I’m only “soso” about
whether what we’re actually looking at really are aliens or something else. But this
subject isn’t going to go away.
As usual, this edition carries a wide range of subject matter and in particular, we step
into the topic of crop circles for the first time in a serious manner. Jenny Randles
appears to have got all this sorted out, or so she keeps telling everyone, ages ago
actually. I’m very pleased for her. I’ve not bothered to read what she’s written and
probably won’t. Difficult to take statements like that seriously and hence the folk
behind them.
My thanks to all this issues contributors.
5
It’s late Spring, the days are longer, we’ve already had the first lambing
season and the crops in the fields are starting to grow. As it’s the UK,
that can only mean one thing.
It’s Crop Circle time.
Interview with Andy Thomas
Mention crop circles to any “serious” ufologist and if you get a reaction at all, it will be
the standard, “They’re all man made”. Or, they shift uncomfortably at the thought of
them because it brings to mind an image of mature baby boomers reliving their hippy
days with shades of the dreaded “New Ageism” thrown in. Serious ufologists care about
which thread screw fell of a particular alleged craft and in the background, there is
some vague awareness that crop circles equals “spirituality”, or, god forbid, thinking.
If you do read this, which of course you should, you will laugh your head off at the
similarities between the two sciences. Yes, sciences. The parallels are striking. Almost
the same problems, the same frustrations, the same difficulties.
So, methinks, if we are going to talk about crop circles in a semiserious ufological
publication, we might as well speak to someone who doesn’t talk bollocks and can
speak to us at a level we appreciate and interact with.
He may not agree but I regard Andy Thomas as the leading voice of Cereology,
certainly in the UK and probably within the top 5 in the world. How do I come to that
conclusion? I’ve read his books, or some of them, and was delighted to be confronted
by a sane, rational, readable, and very wry and amusing individual.
Andy has certainly had his moments. Now an integral part of the Glastonbury
Symposium, his lectures in the past have been anything but conventional, as you will
discover. He probably redefined the concept of the word as his audiences were verbally
and emotionally hit hard over the head with a figurative hammer, as he went about
making his various points.
Plik z chomika:
raptorx1
Inne pliki z tego folderu:
James Churchward - MU zaginiony kontynent.pdf
(3300 KB)
Dolores Cannon - Kosmiczni Ogrodnicy.pdf
(978 KB)
Johannes Fiebag - Tajne Orędzie Fatimskie.pdf
(413 KB)
Farrel P. Joseph - Wojna nuklearna sprzed 5 tysięcy lat.pdf
(3038 KB)
Miloš Jesenský & Robert Leśniakiewicz - Tajemnica księżycowej jaskini.pdf
(690 KB)
Inne foldery tego chomika:
!nowe
!nowe2
★ E-BOOKI ═══════════════
❏ E-booki
1181 ebooków (SF-Fantasy) mobi
Zgłoś jeśli
naruszono regulamin