23 The fatigue behavior of (±55°)3 filament wound GRP pipes with a surface crack under internal pressure.pdf

(761 KB) Pobierz
Composite Structures 80 (2007) 207–211
www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
The fatigue behavior of (±55) 3 filament wound GRP pipes
with a surface crack under internal pressure
N. Tarakcioglu a , A. Samanci b , H. Arikan b, * , A. Akdemir c
a Faculty of Technical Education, University of Sel¸uk, Konya, Turkey
b Cihanbeyli Technical Collage, University of Sel¸uk, Cihanbeyli, 42850 Konya, Turkey
c
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sel¸uk, Konya, Turkey
Available online 10 July 2006
Abstract
In this study, the fatigue behavior of (±55) 3 filament wound composite pipes with a surface crack under alternating internal pressure
has been investigated. Glass reinforced plastic (GRP) pipes were made of E-glass/epoxy and tested in an open-ended condition. For this
study, a PLC controlled hydraulic test stand has been established. Test specimens have antisymmetric six layers which have ±55 winding
angles. Fatigue tests of the pipes with a surface crack which have notch aspect ratio a/c = 0.2 and notch-to-thickness ratios a/t = 0.25,
0.38 and 0.50 in the axial direction have been carried out in accordance with ASTM D-2992. This standard allows a frequency of
25 cycles per minute and an R = 0.05 stress ratio. Tests have been performed at three different maximum stress levels, which were
50%, 40% and 30% of the ultimate hoop stress. Final failure of the GRP pipes has been examined and fatigue test results are presented
by means of (S–N) curves and delamination damage zone area–cycle (A–N) curves.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Polymer–matrix composites (PMCs); Fatigue; Filament winding; Surface crack
1. Introduction
In structural filament wound GRP pipes, cracks have
been found in different forms, locations, orientations, size
and types. Surface crack problems are more complicated
than other crack problems. Stress fields and crack growth
behavior of semi-elliptical or semi-circular surface cracks
greatly depend on the crack shape, size and inclination
crack, as well the pipe dimensions. Surface cracks which
exist in pressure vessels, pipelines, tanks and rocket motor
cases can lead to catastrophic failures, especially in corro-
sive and cyclic loading conditions.
Kaynak and Mat [1] studied the uniaxial fatigue behav-
ior of filament-wound glass-fiber/epoxy composite tubes.
They determined the fatigue lives of ±55 wound specimens
for stress levels of 60%, 70% and 80% of the tensile strength
and applied three different frequencies at each stress level
with constant amplitude sinusoidal loading and a stress
ratio of R = 0.1. Intensive research on filament-wound
fiber-glass/epoxy composite tubes was conducted by Per-
reux and his co-workers [2–5] . The effect of frequency on
the fatigue performance of [+55, 55] laminated composite
Glass fiber reinforced epoxy tubes are being increasingly
used in gas and liquid transfer pipes, high pressure contain-
ers in chemical plants and in the aerospace and defence
industries.
Filament wound composite pipes made of GRP have
many potential advantages over pipes made from conven-
tional materials, such as high specific stiffness and strength,
good corrosion resistance and thermal insulation. With
developments in manufacturing technology to produce fil-
ament wound pipes, there has been a growing interest in
the application of the filament wound fiber-reinforced
cylindrical composite structures. Polymeric composites
offer many cost advantages over metals due to a consider-
ably higher strength–weight ratio.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 332 673 4091; fax: +90 332 673 4090.
E-mail address: harikan@selcuk.edu.tr (H. Arikan).
0263-8223/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.015
997726685.278.png 997726685.289.png 997726685.300.png 997726685.311.png 997726685.001.png
 
208
N. Tarakcioglu et al. / Composite Structures 80 (2007) 207–211
pipes under biaxial loading has been investigated by Per-
reux and Joseph [6] . They analyzed damage propagation
and lifetimes.
A review of the open literature revealed a very limited
number of studies focused on GRP pipes and even fewer
dealing with the fatigue, monotonic behavior and surface
cracks in these structures. The majority of the few experi-
mental investigation on filament wound GRP composite
pipes have studied under open-ended and close-ended
(biaxial) internal pressure and axial loading conditions
[7–14] . The effect of a surface crack on strength has been
investigated theoretically and experimentally for glass/
epoxy filament wound pipes loaded monotonically by
Tarakcioglu et al. [15–18] .
Fatigue behavior of filament wound GRP pipes without
surface cracks have been studied [1–10] . Whereas, the fati-
gue behavior of the GRP pipes with surface cracks have
not .
In this paper, the fatigue behavior of the ±55 filament
wound GRP pipes with a semi-elliptical surface crack.
Also, in these tests, effects on fatigue failure behavior of
sizes of surface crack and applied hoop stress levels have
been investigated.
Fig. 1. GRP pipe with surface crack.
σ
σ
zz
σ
zz
zz
σ θθ
σ θθ
σ θθ
σ
r
σ θθ
σ θθ
σ
zz
σ
zz
Close-ended Open-ended Axial tension
internal pressure internal pressure
(biaxial)
Fig. 2. A pipe under open-ended, close-ended (biaxial) internal pressure
and axial loading conditions.
2. Experimental
2.1. Specimens preparation
mandrel in a slow motion rotary oven. After pulling out
the mandrel, the pipes were post-cured for 2 h at 150 C.
The pipes were cut into the designed test length 300 mm,
using a diamond wheel cutting saw.
Volume fraction (V f ) of the GRP pipes was found to be
0.51 by means of burn-off tests in accordance with ASTM-
D2584. The properties of glass and matrix materials are
given in Table 1 .
Axial elliptical surface cracks were cut by using 1 mm
thick diamond grinding disc. The pipes with a surface crack
have notch aspect ratios, a/c = 0.2 and notch-to-thickness
ratios a/t = 0.25, 0.38 and 0.50 in the axial direction
( Fig. 1 ). Where a, is the crack depth, 2c is crack length, t
is wall thickness. The notches were sharpened by a doctor
blade.
Filament wound GRP pipes which have ±55 winding
angles were manufactured by using a CNC winding
machine by IZORELL Co. Wetrotex 1200 tex E-glass fiber
and CIBA-GEIGY LY 556/HY 917/ DY 070 Bisphenol-A
epoxy resin system which have 100:90:0.5 weight ratios and
CIBA-GEIGY QZ-13 mold release agent were used to
make GRP pipes. Filament wound composite pipes which
have six layers were produced dimensions of 1 m in length,
72 mm inside diameter and 2.25 mm in an average thick-
ness. These structures were cured for 2 h at 135 C on the
Table 1
The properties of glass and matrix materials
E (GPa)
q (g/cm 3 )
m
r u (MPa)
e (%)
2.2. Experimental procedure
Wetrotex 1200
tex E-glass
73.0
0.25
2400
2.6
1.5–2
Ciba Geigy CY
225 epoxy resin
3.4
0.38
50–60
1.2
4–5
The specimens which have a semi-elliptical surface crack
were exposed to fatigue tests under internal pressures at
Fig. 3. Open-ended internal pressure test apparatus.
997726685.022.png 997726685.033.png 997726685.044.png 997726685.055.png 997726685.066.png 997726685.077.png 997726685.088.png 997726685.099.png 997726685.110.png 997726685.121.png 997726685.132.png 997726685.143.png 997726685.154.png 997726685.165.png 997726685.176.png 997726685.187.png 997726685.198.png 997726685.209.png 997726685.220.png 997726685.231.png 997726685.242.png 997726685.251.png 997726685.252.png 997726685.253.png 997726685.254.png 997726685.255.png 997726685.256.png 997726685.257.png 997726685.258.png 997726685.259.png 997726685.260.png 997726685.261.png 997726685.262.png 997726685.263.png 997726685.264.png 997726685.265.png 997726685.266.png 997726685.267.png 997726685.268.png 997726685.269.png 997726685.270.png 997726685.271.png 997726685.272.png 997726685.273.png 997726685.274.png 997726685.275.png 997726685.276.png 997726685.277.png 997726685.279.png 997726685.280.png 997726685.281.png 997726685.282.png 997726685.283.png 997726685.284.png 997726685.285.png 997726685.286.png 997726685.287.png 997726685.288.png 997726685.290.png 997726685.291.png 997726685.292.png 997726685.293.png 997726685.294.png 997726685.295.png 997726685.296.png 997726685.297.png 997726685.298.png 997726685.299.png 997726685.301.png 997726685.302.png 997726685.303.png 997726685.304.png 997726685.305.png 997726685.306.png 997726685.307.png 997726685.308.png 997726685.309.png 997726685.310.png 997726685.312.png 997726685.313.png 997726685.314.png 997726685.315.png 997726685.316.png 997726685.317.png 997726685.318.png 997726685.319.png 997726685.320.png 997726685.321.png 997726685.002.png 997726685.003.png 997726685.004.png 997726685.005.png 997726685.006.png 997726685.007.png 997726685.008.png 997726685.009.png 997726685.010.png 997726685.011.png 997726685.012.png 997726685.013.png 997726685.014.png 997726685.015.png 997726685.016.png 997726685.017.png 997726685.018.png 997726685.019.png 997726685.020.png 997726685.021.png 997726685.023.png 997726685.024.png 997726685.025.png 997726685.026.png 997726685.027.png 997726685.028.png 997726685.029.png 997726685.030.png 997726685.031.png 997726685.032.png 997726685.034.png 997726685.035.png 997726685.036.png 997726685.037.png 997726685.038.png 997726685.039.png 997726685.040.png 997726685.041.png 997726685.042.png 997726685.043.png 997726685.045.png 997726685.046.png 997726685.047.png 997726685.048.png 997726685.049.png 997726685.050.png 997726685.051.png 997726685.052.png 997726685.053.png 997726685.054.png 997726685.056.png 997726685.057.png 997726685.058.png 997726685.059.png 997726685.060.png 997726685.061.png 997726685.062.png 997726685.063.png 997726685.064.png 997726685.065.png 997726685.067.png 997726685.068.png 997726685.069.png 997726685.070.png 997726685.071.png 997726685.072.png 997726685.073.png 997726685.074.png 997726685.075.png 997726685.076.png 997726685.078.png 997726685.079.png 997726685.080.png 997726685.081.png 997726685.082.png 997726685.083.png 997726685.084.png 997726685.085.png 997726685.086.png 997726685.087.png 997726685.089.png 997726685.090.png 997726685.091.png 997726685.092.png 997726685.093.png 997726685.094.png 997726685.095.png 997726685.096.png 997726685.097.png 997726685.098.png 997726685.100.png 997726685.101.png 997726685.102.png 997726685.103.png 997726685.104.png 997726685.105.png 997726685.106.png 997726685.107.png 997726685.108.png 997726685.109.png 997726685.111.png 997726685.112.png 997726685.113.png 997726685.114.png 997726685.115.png 997726685.116.png 997726685.117.png 997726685.118.png 997726685.119.png 997726685.120.png 997726685.122.png 997726685.123.png 997726685.124.png 997726685.125.png 997726685.126.png 997726685.127.png 997726685.128.png 997726685.129.png 997726685.130.png 997726685.131.png 997726685.133.png 997726685.134.png 997726685.135.png 997726685.136.png 997726685.137.png 997726685.138.png 997726685.139.png 997726685.140.png 997726685.141.png 997726685.142.png 997726685.144.png 997726685.145.png 997726685.146.png 997726685.147.png 997726685.148.png 997726685.149.png 997726685.150.png 997726685.151.png 997726685.152.png 997726685.153.png 997726685.155.png 997726685.156.png 997726685.157.png 997726685.158.png 997726685.159.png 997726685.160.png 997726685.161.png 997726685.162.png 997726685.163.png 997726685.164.png 997726685.166.png 997726685.167.png 997726685.168.png 997726685.169.png 997726685.170.png 997726685.171.png 997726685.172.png 997726685.173.png 997726685.174.png 997726685.175.png 997726685.177.png 997726685.178.png 997726685.179.png 997726685.180.png 997726685.181.png 997726685.182.png 997726685.183.png 997726685.184.png 997726685.185.png 997726685.186.png 997726685.188.png 997726685.189.png 997726685.190.png 997726685.191.png 997726685.192.png 997726685.193.png 997726685.194.png
N. Tarakcioglu et al. / Composite Structures 80 (2007) 207–211
209
30% (135 MPa), 40% (180 MPa) and 50% (225 MPa) of
ultimate hoop stress values. The notations and identifica-
tions are used in a pipe under open-ended and close-ended
(biaxial) internal pressure and axial loading conditions are
shown in Fig. 2 . In this work, the tests were carried out
under open-ended internal pressure conditions. Fig. 3
shows open-ended internal pressure test apparatus for
GRP pipes.
350
3. Experimental results and discussion
300
Strain-gauges were produced by HBM Co., type of LY
13 which were assembled on the unnotched GRP pipe in
axial and radial direction in order to obtain the static burst
strength and mechanical properties. These specimens were
loaded with internal pressure to burst pressure by using a
1 MPa/s loading rate.
For determining the stress level to be used in the fatigue
tests, it was necessary to know their static hoop strength
values. So, the mechanical properties of the specimens were
found for static internal pressure conditions. After the
tests, the average values were found as r hhstatic = 450 MPa,
E = 23.17 GPa and m = 0.8.
a/t = 0.25
a/t = 0.38
a/t = 0.50
250
200
150
100
50
0
100
1.000
10.000
100.000
1.000.000
Fatigue cycle (N)
Fig. 4. Stress–life curves of GRP pipe with elliptical surface crack which
have different a/t ratios.
Fig. 5. Propagation of delamination areas at different number of cycles for a/t = 0.38, 0.3r hhstatic (N burst = 98.828).
997726685.195.png 997726685.196.png 997726685.197.png 997726685.199.png 997726685.200.png 997726685.201.png 997726685.202.png 997726685.203.png 997726685.204.png 997726685.205.png
210
N. Tarakcioglu et al. / Composite Structures 80 (2007) 207–211
3.1. Fatigue tests
80
70
Fatigue tests were conducted using a 250 bar PLC con-
trolled servo-hydraulic testing machine. The procedure for
determining the long term strength of a composite pipe is
based on ASTM standard D2992 [19] . The ASTM stan-
dard stipulates cycling the internal hydrostatic pressure at
a rate of 25 cycles per minute (frequency of 0.42 Hz) over
the full pressure range. The magnitude of the fatigue test
stress levels was decided based on the strength under static
internal pressure. Three different stress levels were applied
at one frequency. These maximum stress levels were 30%
(135 MPa), 40% (180 MPa), 50% (225 MPa) of the static
strength of the specimen (r hhstatic ). Fatigue results are pre-
sented and interpreted by means of S–N curves in Fig. 4 .
Stress–life curves show approximately parallelism for each
depth-to-thickness ratio values a/t = 0.25, 0.38 and 0.50.
The failure in fatigue tests propagated at the region
where the surface crack cuts a glass fiber. This failure
region did not exceed the distance of crack length, 2c and
boundary of ±55 winding angle. Fig. 5 shows that the
propagation of delamination at different number of cycles
for a/t = 0.38, 0.3r hhstatic . The crack propagation occurred
in Mode II. In the first stage of the crack propagation, the
delamination area rapidly increased and then slowed down.
In the second failure stage, the remaining lamina failed
like smooth pipe having the same plies under the same fati-
gue conditions. Fatigue of the unnotched lamina under a
surface crack behaved identically to the unnotched GRP
pipe has. Note that the number of remaining lamina under
a crack is 3 for an a/t = 0.50 ratio. So, fatigue characteristic
of these three lamina are similar to the unnotched three
lamina specimens. The number of cycles to failure were
found to be N = 25.446 and N = 2040 at hoop stress levels
respectively for a/t = 0.5. It can be noted that the failure
cycles as N = 20.000 and N = 2000 at the same levels of
hoop stress respectively at the same test conditions were
held for the specimens which have three unnotched lamina
by Perreux and Joseph [6] .
During fatigue testing of the remaining lamina with a
surface crack, three damage mechanism stages were
observed. The first damage mechanism is whitening. At this
stage, debonding and delamination occur. White zones
60
50
σ θθ θθ static
40
0.5
0.4
0.3
30
20
10
0
10
100
1.000
10.000
100.000
Fatigue cycle (N)
Fig. 7. Delamination area versus number of cycles for a/t = 0.38.
140
120
100
80
σ θθ θθ static
60
0.5
0.4
0.3
40
20
0
10
100
1.000
10.000
Fatigue cycle (N)
Fig. 8. Delamination area versus number of cycles for a/t = 0.50.
grew wider and deeper along the fiber winding direction.
Also, micro cracks
started along the fiber winding
direction.
The second stage is pin hole formation and a leakage
stage. The pin hole occurs due to delamination in this
region. It progresses from the inner surface outwards and
opens and closes due to the pressurized fluid effect at each
loading cycle. When the pin hole reaches the outer surface,
leakage damage begins. The leakage begins at the pin hole
region as a small droplet. After a few number of cycles, an
initiation point of intense leakage begins. As the last stage
in the damage progress, fiber breakage takes place [18] .
The photograph of the damage zone near the surface
crack where whitening region come from delamination area
was taken by a digital camera which macro distance is
4 cm. The delamination areas from photographs were accu-
rately measured by an AutoCAD programme. The delam-
ination areas versus number of cycles (A–N) are given in
Figs. 6–8 for a/t = 0.25, 0.38 and 0.50, respectively. Also
A–N curves are shown for different hoop stress levels;
0.3, 0.4 and 0.5r hhstatic , respectively. When the numbers
of cycles increase, the delamination area increased. While
propagation of the delamination area decreased, delamina-
tion area rates conversely decreased.
45
40
35
σ θθ θθ static
30
25
20
0.5
0.4
0.3
15
10
5
4. Conclusions
0
1.000
10.000
100.000
Fatigue cycle (N)
In this study, the fatigue tests of ±55 filament wound
GRP pipes with a semi-elliptical surface crack were carried
Fig. 6. Delamination area versus number of cycles for a/t = 0.25.
997726685.206.png 997726685.207.png 997726685.208.png 997726685.210.png 997726685.211.png 997726685.212.png 997726685.213.png 997726685.214.png 997726685.215.png 997726685.216.png 997726685.217.png 997726685.218.png 997726685.219.png 997726685.221.png 997726685.222.png 997726685.223.png 997726685.224.png 997726685.225.png 997726685.226.png 997726685.227.png 997726685.228.png 997726685.229.png 997726685.230.png 997726685.232.png 997726685.233.png 997726685.234.png 997726685.235.png 997726685.236.png 997726685.237.png 997726685.238.png 997726685.239.png 997726685.240.png 997726685.241.png 997726685.243.png 997726685.244.png 997726685.245.png 997726685.246.png 997726685.247.png 997726685.248.png 997726685.249.png 997726685.250.png
N. Tarakcioglu et al. / Composite Structures 80 (2007) 207–211
211
out under open-ended internal pressure. The effect of
notch-to-depth ratios and hoop stress level ratios were
investigated on the fatigue life. Also, the relationship
between delamination area versus fatigue cycle (A–N) were
investigated.
The following conclusions are drawn from the experi-
mental results and the failure observations of the fatigue
tests:
composite pipes
in biaxial
loading. Compos Part B—Eng
1998;29:715–23.
[4] Perreux D, Suri C. Study of the coupling between the phenomena of
water absorption and damage in glass/epoxy composite pipes.
Compos Sci Technol 1997;57:1403–13.
[5] Joseph E, Perreux D. Fatigue behavior of glass-fiber/epoxy-matrix
filament-wound pipes. Compos Sci Technol 1994;52:469–80.
[6] Perreux D, Joseph D. The effect of frequency on the fatigue
performance of filament wound pipes under biaxial fatigue experi-
mental
results
and
damage model. Compos
Sci Technol
1997;57:353–64.
[7] Philippidis TP, Anastasios P. Complex stress state effect on fatigue
life of GRP laminates, Part I. J Fatigue 2001;24:813–23.
[8] Shan Y, Liao K. Environmental fatigue behavior and life prediction
of unidirectional glass–carbon/epoxy hybrid composites. J Fatigue
2002;24:847–59.
[9] Vanpaepegem W, Degrieck J. Fatigue degradation modeling of plane
woven
• In the fatigue tests, the failure only occurred at the
region where the surface crack cuts a glass fiber. This
failure did not exceed the crack length, 2c or the bound-
ary of ±55 winding angle. Crack propagation effec-
tively occurred in Mode II.
• At the first stage of the delamination propagation, the
delamination area rapidly increased and then slowed
down.
• In the second failure stage, the remaining lamina failed
as like smooth pipe, having the same stacking sequence
under the same fatigue conditions. Fatigue of the unnot-
ched lamina under a surface crack behaved identically to
the unnotched GRP pipe.
• The maximum fatigue lives were found as N = 150.000,
60.000 and 20.000 for a/t = 0.25, 0.38 and 0.50,
respectively.
glass/epoxy
composites. Compos
Part A—Appl
S
2001;32:1433–41.
[10] Ellyin F, Martens M. Biaxial fatigue behavior of a multidirectional
filament-wound glass-fiber/epoxy pipe. Compos Sci Technol
2001;61:491–502.
[11] Martin RH, Murri GB. Characterization of Mode I and Mode II
delamination growth and thresholds in composites. Compos Mater
Test Des 1990;11:251–70.
[12] Richard F, Perreux D. A reliability method for optimization of /
fiber reinforced composite pipes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2000;68:53–9.
[13] Tong J. Characteristics of fatigue crack growth in GFRP laminates.
Int J Fatigue 2002;24:291–7.
[14] Devrajsinh, RA. Development of a new fatigue damage growth model
for polymer matrix composites, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wayne
State, USA, 1997.
[15] Tarak¸ıo˘ lu N, Akdemir A, Avcı A. Strength of filament wound GRP
pipes with surface crack. Compos Part B—Eng 2001;32:131–8.
[16] Tarakcioglu N, Gemi L, Yapici A. Fatigue failure behavior of glass/
epoxy ±55 filament wound pipes under internal pressure. Compos
Sci Technol 2005;65:703–8.
[17] Tarakcioglu N, Gemi L, ¨ zcan M. Fatigue behavior of ±45 filament
wound GRP pipes under internal pressure. In: Sixth international
fracture conference, Turkey, 2003. p. 405–13.
[18] Tarakcioglu N, Gemi L, Yapici A. Fatigue behavior of ±55 filament
wound GRP pipes under internal pressure. In: Sixth international
fracture conference, Turkey, 2003. p. 415–22.
[19] Standard practice for obtaining hydrostatic or pressure design basis
for ‘‘fiberglass’’ (glass-fiber-reinforced thermosetting resin) pipe and
fittings. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) designation:
D2992-91.
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported that by Coordination
of Scientism Research at Selcuk University, Project no.
2003-45.
References
[1] Kaynak C, Mat O. Uniaxial fatigue behavior of filament-wound
glass-fiber/epoxy composite tubes. Compos Sci Technol 2001;61:
1833–40.
[2] Rousseau J, Perreux D, Verdiere N. Influence of winding patterns on
the damage behavior of filament-wound pipes. Compos Sci Technol
1999;59:1439–49.
[3] Ferry L, Perreux D, Rousseau J, Richard F. Interaction between
plasticity and damage in the behavior of [+/, /] n fiber reinforced
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin