Process Control Systems.pdf

(7083 KB) Pobierz
87400701 UNPDF
*More than 150,000 articles in the
search database
*Learn how almost everything
works
87400701.004.png
Application
F. G. SHINSKEY
Systems Design Engineer, The Foxboro Company
“\
I
M C GRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY a
New York
Toronto
London
Sydney
San Francisco
87400701.005.png 87400701.006.png 87400701.007.png 87400701.001.png
87400701.002.png
. . .
viii
I Preface
are not communicated to the people who must apply them. Control
problems arise in the plant and must be solved in the plant. Until plant
engineers and control designers are able to communicate with each
other, their mutual problems await solution. I do not mean to imply
that abstract mathematics is not capable of solving control problems, but
it is striking how often the same solution can be reached by using good
common sense. High-order equations and high-speed computers can
be manipulated to the point where common sense is dulled.
Some months ago I was asked to give a course on process control to
a large group of engineers from various departments of The Foxboro
Company. Sales, Product Design, Research, Quality Control, and
Project Engineering were all to be represented. If the subject were
presented through the traditional medium of operational calculus, the
effort would be wasted, because too few of the students would have this
prerequisite. Rather than attempt to teach operational calculus, I
chose to do without it altogether. It then became necessary to approach
control problems solely in the time domain. Once the transition was
begun, I was surprised at the fresh point of view which evolved. Some
situations which were clouded when expressed in frequency or in complex
numbers were now easily resolved. Dead time, fundamental to any
transport process, is naturally treated in the time domain.
The value of this new approach was evident at once. In the very
first session the student was able to understand why a control loop behaves
the way it does: why it oscillates at a particular period, and what deter-
mines its damping. The subject was tangible and alive to many students
for the first time. Interest ran high, and the course was an immediate
success. The great demand for notes prompted the undertaking of
this book.
Through the years, I have observed many phenomena about control
loops which have never been explained to my satisfaction. Why does
a flow controller need such a wide proportional band, whereas a pressure
controller does not? Why is derivative less effective in a loop contain-
ing dead time than in a multicapacity loop? Why are some chemical
reactors impossible to control? What makes composition control SO
difficult? Why cannot some oscillations be damped? These and many
other observations are explained in this book and perhaps nowhere else.
It is always very satisfying to learn the reasons behind the behavior
of things which are familar, or to see accepted principles proven in a new
and different way. Therefore i expect that those who are accustomed
to the more conventional approaches to control system design will find
this treatment as interesting as those who are not familiar with any.
In spite of the simplicity of this presentation, we are not kept from
Preface I ix
applying the most advanced concepts of automatic control. Feedfor-
ward control has proven itself capable of a hundredfold improvement
over what conventional methods of regulation can deliver. Recent
developments in nonlinear control systems have pushed beyond tradi-
tional barriers-achieving truly optimum performance. These advances
are not just speculation-they are paying out in increased throughput
and recovered product. Although their impact on the process industries
is as yet scarcely felt, the revolution is inevitable. The need for economy
will make it so.
But the most brilliantly conceived control strategy, by itself, is noth-
ing. By the same token, the most definitive mathematical representa-
tion of the process, alone, is worthless. The control system must be
the embodiment of the process characteristics if it is to perform as
intended. Without a process, there can be no control system. Anyone
who designs controls without knowing what is to be controlled is fooling
himself. A pressure regulator cannot be used to control composition.
Neither can a temperature controller on a fractionator perform the same
function as one on a heater. For these reasons this entire text is written
from the viewpoint of the needs of the process. Each type of physical-
chemical operation which has a history of misbehavior is treated in-
dividually. Not every situation can be covered, because plants and
specifications differ, and so do people. If for no other reason, this book
will never be complete. But enough attention is given to basic prin-
ciples and typical applications to permit extension to a broad area of
problems. The plant engineer can take it from there.
In appreciation for their assistance in this endeavor, I wish to express
my gratitude to Bill Vannah for providing the initiative, to Molly
Dickinson, who did all the typing, and to John Louis for his thoughtful
criticism.
Greg Shinskey
87400701.003.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin