E_M_Goldratt_-_The_Goal.pdf

(3653 KB) Pobierz
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement, Third Revised Edition
Captured by Plamen T.
273942978.004.png 273942978.005.png 273942978.006.png
THE GOAL
By
Eliyahu M. Goldratt
and
Jeff Cox
With interviews by David Whitford,
Editor at Large, Fortune Small Business
North River Press
Captured by Plamen T.
A Process of Ongoing Improvement
THIRD REVISED EDITION
273942978.007.png
Additional copies can be obtained from your local
bookstore or the publisher:
The North River Press
Publishing Corporation
P.O. Box 567
Great Barrington, MA 01230
(800) 486-2665 or (413) 528-0034
First Edition Copyright © 1984 Eliyahu M. Goldratt
Revised Edition Copyright © 1986 Eliyahu M. Goldratt
Second revised Edition © 1992 Eliyahu M. Goldratt
Third Revised Edition © 2004 Eliyahu M. Goldratt
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or
any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publisher
Manufactured in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Goldratt, Eliyahu M., 1948-
The goal: a process of ongoing improvement
I. Coxjeff, 1951-. II. Title
PR9510.9.G64G61986 823 86-12566
ISBN: 0-88427-178-1
Captured by Plamen T.
273942978.001.png
1
INTRODUCTION
The Goal is about science and education. I believe that these
two words have been abused to the extent that their original
meanings have been lost in a fog of too much respect and mys-
tery. Science for me, and for the vast majority of respectable sci-
entists, is not about the secrets of nature or even about truths.
Science is simply the method we use to try and postulate a mini-
mum set of assumptions that can explain, through a straightfor-
ward logical derivation, the existence of many phenomena of na-
ture.
The Law of Conservation of Energy of physics is not truth. It
is just an assumption that is valid in explaining a tremendous
amount of natural phenomena. Such an assumption can never be
proven since even an infinite number of phenomena that can be
explained by it does not prove its universal application. On the
other hand, it can be disproved by just a single phenomenon that
cannot be explained by the assumption. This disproving does not
detract from the validity of the assumption. It just highlights the
need or even the existence of another assumption that is more
valid. This is the case with the assumption of the conservation of
energy which was replaced by Einstein's more global-more valid
-postulation of the conservation of energy and mass. Einstein's
assumption is not true to the same extent that the previous one
was not "true".
Somehow we have restricted the connotation of science to a
very selective, limited assemblage of natural phenomena. We re-
fer to science when we deal with physics, chemistry or biology.
We should also realize that there are many more phenomena of
nature that do not fall into these categories, for instance those
phenomena we see in organizations, particularly those in indus-
trial organizations. If these phenomena are not phenomena of
nature, what are they? Do we want to place what we see in organi-
zations to the arena of fiction rather than into reality?
E.M. Goldratt
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement
Captured by Plamen T.
273942978.002.png
2
This book is an attempt to show that we can postulate a very
small number of assumptions and utilize them to explain a very
large spectrum of industrial phenomena. You the reader can
judge whether or not the logic of the book's derivation from its
assumptions to the phenomena we see daily in our plants is so
flawless that you call it common sense. Incidentally, common
sense is not so common and is the highest praise we give to a
chain of logical conclusions. If you do, you basically have taken
science from the ivory tower of academia and put it where it
belongs, within the reach of every one of us and made it applica-
ble to what we see around us.
What I have attempted to show with this book is that no
exceptional brain power is needed to construct a new science or
to expand on an existing one. What is needed is just the courage
to face inconsistencies and to avoid running away from them just
because "that's the way it was always done". I dared to interweave
into the book a family life struggle, which I assume is quite famil-
iar to any manager who is to some extent obsessed with his work.
This was not done just to make the book more popular, but to
highlight the fact that we tend to disqualify many phenomena of
nature as irrelevent as far as science is concerned.
I have also attempted to show in the book the meaning of
education. I sincerely believe that the only way we can learn is
through our deductive process. Presenting us with final conclu-
sions is not a way that we learn. At best it is a way that we are
trained. That's why I tried to deliver the message contained in
the book in the Socratic way. Jonah, in spite of his knowledge of
the solutions, provoked Alex to derive them by supplying the
question marks instead of the exclamation marks. I believe that
because of this method, you the reader will deduce the answers
well before Alex Rogo succeeds in doing so. If you find the book
entertaining maybe you will agree with me that this is the way to
educate, this is the way we should attempt to write our textbooks.
Our textbooks should not present us with a series of end results
but rather a plot that enables the reader to go through the deduc-
tion process himself. If I succeed by this book to change some-
what your perception of science and education, this is my true
reward.
E.M. Goldratt
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement
Captured by Plamen T.
273942978.003.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin