Hatina2005.pdf

(194 KB) Pobierz
409244113 UNPDF
Journal of Political Ideologies (October 2005),
10(3), 241–267
Theology and power in the Middle
East: Palestinian martyrdom in
a comparative perspective
MEIR HATINA
Department of Islam and Middle Eastern Studies, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
A BSTRACT Jihad (holy war) and self-sacrifice constituted a formative ethos
for Palestinian Islam in its struggle against Israel from the early 1990s
onward. They became important components of politics of identity, aimed at
infusing metaphysical values into Palestinian life, while also positing a
political alternative to the PLO. This paper focuses on a formative manifesto
titled ‘Readings in the Laws of Martyrdom’ (Qira’a fi Fiqh al-Shahada).
Disseminated by the Islamic Jihad in 1988, the manifesto laid down the
ideological foundations of martyrdom in Palestine. With the passage of time,
Palestinian ‘suicide attacks’ became unprecedented in scale, distinctive
thereby from similar phenomena in other conflicted areas such as Lebanon,
Kashmir, Chechnya, Turkey and Sri Lanka. The discussion evaluates the role
of the Palestinian manifesto in the radical Islamic orbit. For this purpose, two
other formative texts are also examined. The first is ‘The Absent Duty’, issued
in 1981 by the Egyptian Jihad movement, which was responsible for President
Sadat’s assassination. The second is ‘Manual for a Raid’, issued by the al-
Qa‘ida organization, containing instructions for the perpetrators of the attacks
in the United States on September 11, 2001. A comparative analysis of the
three texts reveals common themes as well as variations that reflect the
particular context in which each Islamic group was active.
A nation familiar with the art of death, and that knows how to die an honorable death, will be
bestowed by Allah a glorified life on earth and eternal pleasures in the hereafter. 1
Correspondence Address: Meir Hatina, Department of Islam and Middle Eastern Studies, Institute of Asian and
African Studies, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. Email: mhatina@mscc.huji.ac.il
ISSN 1356-9317 print; ISSN 1469-9613 online/05/030241–27 q 2005 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/13569310500244289
409244113.001.png
 
meir hatina
Introduction
Jihad (holy war) and self-sacrifice constituted a formative ethos for Palestinian
Islam in its struggle against Israel from the early 1990s onward. They became
important components of politics of identity by interpreting the past through the
prism of the pressing claims of the present. 2 The very act of martyrdom in the
name of a superior moral authority delivered the dramatic message that the conflict
in Palestine was as much cultural as territorial. Islamic violence against Israel
aimed to infuse metaphysical values into Palestinian life, while also serving as an
effective mode of resistance in a period of a search for peace, thereby positing a
political alternative to the PLO and the Palestinian Authority (PA). The
intertwining of religion and politics as impelling Islamic violence was aptly
articulated by the leader of Islamic Jihad, Fathi al-Shiqaqi, in November 1994,
shortly after the establishment of the PA: ‘Without the martyrs we have no life or
history, no past, glory or value. It is they who pave the way for us for the future,
and not the cowards who keep silent, defeatists who trade off the homeland and
sell off Jerusalem’. 3
Backed by two scriptural commands—death for the sake of Allah, and the duty
to forbid wrongdoing (nahy ‘an al-munkar)—self-sacrifice became a moral code
justifying ‘suicide attacks’ 4 against Israel. These acts were defined by Islamists
and other local observers as ‘martyrdom’ (istishhad), but were perceived by
Westerners, who had long since ceased to regard religion as a central priority,
simply as fanaticism or, alternatively, as nihilism and self-destruction. The
sharpest critics defined the Muslim who sacrifices himself as motivated by a greed
for honor, a desire to retaliate, or a thirst for blood, while harboring a fantasy of
going to heaven. 5 Other Western observers held that Islamic violence was not the
result of blind outrage but was a political act that seeks to reshape the world as
more just and equal. 6 Whatever the perceptions in the Western intellectual
spectrum, clearly the phenomenon of ‘human bombs’ captured the attention of the
Western world no less than the Arab Muslim world.
This paper focuses on a formative manifesto title ‘Readings in the Laws of
Martyrdom’ (Qira’a fi Fiqh al-Shahada). Disseminated by the Islamic Jihad in
1988, the manifesto laid down the ideological foundations of martyrdom in
Palestine. Islamic Jihad was in fact the first movement in the Palestinian arena to
turn Islam into a theology of liberation against Israel in the late 1970s, as well as
the first to legitimize the ethos of self-sacrifice. 7 With the passage of time,
Palestinian ‘suicide attacks’ became unprecedented in scale, distinguished thereby
from similar phenomena in other conflicted areas such as Lebanon, Kashmir,
Chechnya, Turkey and Sri Lanka. 8
The discussion below evaluates the role of the Palestinian manifesto in the
radical Islamic orbit. For this purpose, two other formative texts are also
instructive. The first is ‘The Absent Duty’, issued in 1981 by the Egyptian Jihad
movement, which advocated armed jihad against deviant Arab regimes, laying the
foundation for the assassination of President Sadat. The second is ‘Manual for a
Raid’, issued in 2001 by the al-Qa‘ida organization, containing instructions for the
242
theology and power in the middle east
perpetrators of the attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001.
A comparative analysis of the three texts reveals a commonality alongside
variations that reflect the particular context in which each Islamic group was active.
The essay, or manifesto, under discussion, ‘Readings in the Laws of
Martyrdom’, appeared as an appendix to a journal published in Nicosia identified
with the Islamic Jihad, al-Islam wa-Filastin in June 1988. 9 The essay is unsigned.
According to Abdulaziz Zamel, an Arabic scholar at Tampa University, Florida,
who was associated with Palestinian Jihad circles, the author was Misbah al-Suri
and the content was based on lectures he delivered to fellow detainees in an Israeli
prison. 10 Al-Suri, a former leftist, became a strict Muslim and thereafter was a key
activist in the military arm of the Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip. He was killed in a
clash with Israeli forces in October 1987. Another possibility, no less plausible,
regarding the source of the essay, is that it was written by one of the two leaders of
the movement, Fathi al-Shiqaqi, or Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ‘Awda.
The essay was distributed in the early stages of the 1987 Intifada (uprising),
with the aim of heightening the momentum of the Palestinian revolt against Israeli
occupation from civil protest to a military operation. Although the extent of the
manifesto’s circulation is not clear, the timing of its publication overlapped with
the forging of a close link between Islamic Jihad and Iran and its prot´g´,
Hizballah, as a result of Israel’s expulsion of the top Islamic Jihad leadership to
Lebanon at that time. The revolutionary Shi‘a, beyond serving as a source of
ideological inspiration, evolved at that point into a logistic arm for Islamic Jihad. 11
This close affinity also engendered new emphases in the rhetoric of the struggle in
Palestine, focusing especially on self-sacrifice. These emphases feature
prominently in the essay under review.
Martyrdom: Personal and collective salvation
Alternating between defiance and apologetics, the essay aims at molding a new
believer imbued with determination and a sense of mission, going beyond ritual to
an embrace of revolutionary activism. The essay also seeks to formulate a new
agenda for Islamic politics in Palestine and beyond, based on a carefully
constructed ethos of death which relies both on judicial arguments and on the
critical nature of the conflict in Palestine. The text opens, pointedly, with a
discussion of the differences between self-immolation (intihar), which lacks any
religious purpose and is motivated solely by a desire for relief from personal
distress, and martyrdom, which occurs in the battlefield and represents the
pinnacle of faith. Self-immolation condemns the perpetrator to endless torment in
hell, while martyrdom grants him the pleasures of heaven. 12 Notably, the
prohibition of self-immolation is ingrained in the Islamic ethic, which, like
Judaism and Christianity, preaches the duty to bear suffering and pain, since life is
a gift bestowed by God, with continuity in the hereafter. Since Allah is the sole
authority over human affairs, self-immolation by His creatures constitutes a
blatant violation of that authority, punishable by excommunication from the
243
meir hatina
Muslim community. 13 In contrast, martyrdom is deeply entrenched historically in
the Islamic judicial and communal consensus.
The need to sharpen the divide between these two types of death, which is
reiterated in the text several times, relies heavily on verses from the Qur’an and the
hadith (the Prophet’s sayings). The focus on this issue reflected the awareness by
Islamic Jihad of the sensitivity of suicide in Islam and the fear that such acts would
be interpreted as acts of desperation purely as a result of the ongoing occupation.
Such an interpretation would detract from the attractiveness of Islam as a theology
of liberation and as the sole vehicle for the final victory. To neutralize such a
danger, and to keep ‘suicide attacks’ within the confines of sanctity, the manifesto
highlighted two basic elements: the duty of jihad, and the acute nature of the
struggle in Palestine.
The duty of jihad
The manifesto’s reference to the doctrine of jihad is deliberate and insistent, based
on the central position of the notion of holy war in Islamic theology and law. Jihad is
linked to the ultimate goal of reaffirming the moral superiority of Islam over other
cultures and sharpening the divisions betweenMuslims and infidels. Any neglect of
military jihad is tantamount to a grave sin and to nifaq, or hypocrisy, i.e. having
weak faith or even undermining the faith of others. 14 In the words of the hadith,
‘Whoever dies without fighting or expressing readiness to fight [for Allah] dies as a
hypocrite’. An extensive body of literature exalting the idea of jihad ( fada’il al-
jihad) developed over the centuries, transforming it into a symbolic code that could
be evoked at any given moment, and especially in times of crisis and distress, to
awaken fervor for self-sacrifice. 15 The Crusades in the mid-twelfth century
provided such an occasion. Another was the Mongol invasion in the mid-thirteenth
century. This symbolic element gained vitality and dominance with the declining
position of the Muslims vis- ` -vis theWest in the modern era. Once a superior world
power, the Muslim community gradually found itself marginalized, lagging behind
the progressive Western nations and often subjected to their domination. Yet, the
glorified voices of the past, juxtaposed with the acute challenges of the present,
combined to produce a political revolution in the formof radical Islamicmovements
such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Typically, the 1988 essay positions jihad as an
inspirational model, thereby paving the way to the link with self-sacrifice.
The doctrine of jihad, the essay argues, also defines the essence of life on earth,
which is not limited to self-preservation and satisfying man’s physical needs but
includes dedication to spreading the word of Allah, which signifies the victory of
truth and justice. The notion of the negligibility of life as compared to total
devotion to Allah is aptly expressed in the manifesto by quoting Khalid ibn
al-Walid (d. 642), the commander of the Muslim armies which brought an end to
Byzantine rule in Syria and Palestine. He observed that the passion to encounter
Allah’s enemies after a freezing night on the battlefront is much stronger than the
passion for the embrace of a young bride on a warm night. 16 Total commitment to
an exalted act beyond the mundane realm leads the Muslim martyr to cease caring
244
theology and power in the middle east
about his personal fate and to focus on the meaning of life in relation to a welcome
death. In this sense, jihad for Allah does not contradict the value of preserving
life. 17 Moreover, killing others is proscribed by certain restrictions, the essay
emphasizes, quoting the Qur’an: ‘... you slay not the soul God has forbidden,
except by right’ (Sura 6: 151). Jihad against the infidels, however, is an exception,
because it is killing for the purpose of promoting ‘a just cause’ (haqq, which is also
synonym for Allah). 18
The definitive test for pleasing Allah is the intention (niya) to become a martyr,
according to the essay. This elevates Islam to a higher moral plane than Western
philosophies, which justify death and bloodshed only for the purpose of gaining
material assets such as imperial expansion, or, alternatively, which sanctify the
value of life over the worship of God. The result is tyranny, exploitation and
selfishness, which are avoided in Islam precisely because of the balance it dictates
between preserving life and martyrdom. 19
Clearly, Islamic Jihad, as a quasi-military movement that raised the banner of
jihad in Palestine, was not interested in simply maintaining this balance but in
altering it to favor the martyrdom dimension. Martyrdom is exalted in the essay as
an act of worship, parallel to a vow or transaction that must be fulfilled as part of
belief in Allah. 20 It is placed in the same category as refusing to submit to pressure
to speak heresy, or taking a firm stand in the name of holy truth against tyrannical
rulers—situations in which the believer knows that such behavior will lead to his
death. As an act of worship, martyrdom exchanges transient life for eternal life. It
bestows the rewards of paradise, such as purifying the martyr’s soul from all sins;
bringing him into the company of the prophets, the just, martyrs, and the righteous;
and ensuring a place in heaven for 70 of his relatives. 21 Notably, the sexual
motivation of marrying 72 black-eyed virgins, which captured Western attention,
does not appear in the manifesto, but only in later documents, mainly wills left by
‘suicide’ bombers. Conceivably, this issue was avoided in the interest of
presenting arguments that were more sober and weightier.
Moreover, martyrdom for Allah and for the faith, according to the manifesto,
constitutes not only a personal guarantee of rewards in paradise but also collective
insurance for the emancipation of the political community. As such, the religious
idea was intertwined with pragmatic national considerations, with the martyr
becoming a cultural agent—a symbol of revolution and liberation. In this context,
the text posits a ‘cost-benefit’ doctrine (maslaha) which holds that the welfare of
the public justifies an altruistic personal sacrifice. Ironically, whereas Muslim
reformists enlisted the doctrine of maslaha to diffuse sectarian and cultural
tensions as a response to the challenges of modernity, radical Islamists such as
Palestinian Islamic Jihad used this doctrine to reinforce the divisions between
Islam and its cultural environment and to promote revolutionary activism. 22
The nature of the struggle in Palestine
Linking individual salvation to collective emancipation paved the way for the
Islamic Jihad to highlight the second element in justifying self-sacrifice, namely
245
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin