Warship Profile 19 - HMS Hood, Battle-Cruiser 1916-1941.pdf

(3667 KB) Pobierz
311265174 UNPDF
arsni
n n
HMS Hood/Battle -Cruiser 1916-1941
Operational History
by R. G. Robertson, CA
Profile
311265174.021.png 311265174.022.png 311265174.023.png 311265174.024.png 311265174.001.png 311265174.002.png 311265174.003.png 311265174.004.png 311265174.005.png 311265174.006.png 311265174.007.png
The technical history of HMS Hood will be
published shortly.
COVER PHOTO:
The Hood during the Spanish Civil War 1937. Note anti-
torpedo bulge.
311265174.008.png 311265174.009.png 311265174.010.png 311265174.011.png 311265174.012.png 311265174.013.png 311265174.014.png
The Hood fitting out at John Brown's Yard, Clydebank, 9January 1920.
HMS HO O D/B attle-Cruiser 1916-1941
by R. G. Robertson, CA
Operational History
For almost 20 years she was the largest warship in
the world. Few, if any, of the others could match the
beauty of her lines, none could match her speed of
30 knots, combined with a main armament of eight
15in guns. In the navies of the world she was in a
class by herself and her formidable appearance
excited the admiration of all who set eyes upon her.
Such a ship was the Hood. When she was sunk by a
few shells from the German battleship Bismarck in
the early hours of Empire Day 1941 it seemed to
many in Britain and the Commonwealth that they
had lost a part of their naval heritage.
As it would be impossible to do justiceto such a ship
in one Profile it was decided to publish the story of
the last 10 years of her life now, leaving a later
Warship Profile to tell of her design, her building
and her early years in service.
Design Changes
As a result of Jutland very extensive investigations
were carried out on the design of the Hood and it was
found that considerable protection could be added
by accepting a deeper draught and a slightly
reduced speed.
On account of the design changes an additional
5000 tons of armour were worked into her hull and
although the total weight of the armour and
protection at 13,800 tons was almost equal to one-
third of her load displacement and was nearly as
heavy as that of a contemporary battleship, the
Hood remained a battle-cruiser in conception.
There is no doubt that she could have withstood
severe punishment from torpedoes, mines or shell-fire
directed against her sides. The tragedy of her
otherwise superb design was her lack of sufficient
deck armour. Had this been provided when she was
145
311265174.015.png 311265174.016.png
The Hood on trials in the Clyde, 5 March 1920.
built, the result of her action with the Prince of Wales
against the Bismarck might well have been very
different.
Searchlights
4 36in on platform between funnels
2 36in on After Control Position
2 36in on foremast
4 24in signalling (on admiral's bridge)
THE SHIP AS COMPLETED IN 1920
Laid down:
Design modified:
Launched:
Trials completed:
Commissioned:
Displacement:
31 May 1916 (original design)
1 September 1916
22 August 1918
5 March 1920
15 May 1920
41,200 tons at 28ft bin draught
45,200 tons at 31 ft 6in draught
860ft 7in
850ft
81 Oft
95ft at 28ft 6in draught
105ft 212 in
1169
Boats carried
2 50ft steam picket boats
1 45ft admiral's barge
1 35ft motor boat
1 42ft sailing launch with auxiliary motor
1 36ft pinnace
4 32ft cutters
1 32ft galley
2 30ft captain's gigs
227ft whalers
21 6ft dinghies
7 large and 2 small Carley floats
Length (overall):
Length (waterline):
Length (B.P.):
Breadth (waterline):
Breadth (outside bulges)
Complement (1923):
Armament
815in Mark 1 (1913)
12 5 5in Mark I
(spare guns from Chester and Birkenhead
who were taken over from Greece)
Her Early Years
After reaching a mean speed of 32.07 knots on her
trials held in the Clyde during February and March
1920 in stormy weather, the Hood commissioned
on 15 May 1920. Two visits to Scandinavia and a
world cruise were the most notable events of her
early years in service.
On 17 May 1929 she paid off into Dockyard
control at Portsmouth to undergo the most extensive
refit since her completion, a reconstruction which
lasted two years, until 12 May 1931.
44in Mark V AA
43-pounders
2 21 in submerged torpedo-tubes
4 21 in above water torpedo-tubes
Protection
Side midships.
Side forward:
Side aft:
Side submerged:
Barbettes:
Turrets:
Conning Tower:
1 2in, 7in, 5in
6in, 5in
6in
3in
1 2in
Face 1 5in
Side 1 2in, 11 in
Outer shell 1 2in
Inner shell 6in
Crown 5in
6in
Proposed Reconstruction
In the years immediately preceding the war, plans
had been drawn up for a reconstruction of the Hood.
It had been intended that the work would begin
when the Renown's major refit was completed in
1939. From 'B' 1 5in turret forward to 'X' 1 5in turret
aft, the Hood would have been completely refitted.
The changes would have included:
The complete removal of the conning tower and
bridge structure.
The removal of all the 5.5in guns and the above-
water torpedo tubes.
The removal of the 4in AA guns.
Director Tower:
After Torpedo
Control Tower:
Decks:
4in, 3in
Fo'c'sle 1'z in
Upper 1 in, fin
Main 2in, 112in
Main (over magazines) 3in
Lower, forward 1 f-1 in
Lower, aft 2in 1 in
Machinery
Brown Curtis geared turbine
SHP: 144,000
Propellers: 4
Designed speed: 31 knots
Trial speed (maximum): 3207 knots
Oil fuel (maximum):
4000 tons
146
311265174.017.png 311265174.018.png
Hood's seaplane and catapult July 1931.
June 1931.
In their place would have been fitted a modern
bridge structure incorporating aircraft hangars as in
the King George V class; eight twin 5.25in dual-
purpose guns in four twin mountings, to port and
starboard midships. (These guns were to prove
extremely successful in the Dido class of cruiser.)
A point of particular interest was the intention
greatly to increase her deck armour. Modifications
would also have been made to her under-water
protection. It was also intended to fit new machinery
with high-pressure boilers.
It was not expected that these alterations would have
greatly increased her tonnage. About 4000 tons of
unnecessary weight-the conning tower alone
weighed over 900 tons-would have been removed
and this would have allowed for the necessary
increase in her protection, just where it was most
needed.
Had it been possible for the Hood to have been
modernised along the lines planned she would
indeed have been a match for any of her adversaries,
German, Italian or Japanese. With the international
situation as it was in 1939 there was, of course, no
possibility of allowing her to be out of commission
for the time necessary to complete such a refit. All
that could be done when she returned to Portsmouth
in February 1939 was to increase her AA armament
and fit other supplementary equipment.
Portsmouth Refit:
February - August 1939
The four 4in single AA mountings were removed and
replaced by four twin 4in mountings on the boat
deck between the after funnel and mainmast.
Two High-Angle Directors were fitted on either side
of the signal platform on the bridge structure. Two
High-Angle Calculating Positions with the latest
High-Angle calculating tables served the new 4in
mountings.
June 1931.
147
311265174.019.png 311265174.020.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin