Philosophy - David Hume - The Natural History of Religion.pdf

(91 KB) Pobierz
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
David Hume
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
Table of Contents
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION. .................................................................................................1
David Hume. ............................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION. .................................................................................................................................1
SECT. I. (That Polytheism was the primary Religion of Men).. ............................................................2
SECT. II. (Origin of Polytheism). ..........................................................................................................3
SECT. III. (The same subject continued). ..............................................................................................4
SECT. IV. (Deities not considered as creators or formers of the world). .............................................6
SECT. V. (Various Forms of Polytheism: Allegory, Hero−Worship). ..................................................9
SECT. VI. (Origin of Theism from Polytheism).. ................................................................................10
SECT. VII. (Confirmation of this Doctrine).. .......................................................................................13
SECT. VIII. (Flux and reflux of polytheism and theism).. ...................................................................13
SECT. X. (With regard to courage or abasement).. ..............................................................................16
SECT. XI. (With regard to reason or absurdity).. .................................................................................16
SECT. XII. (With regard to Doubt or Conviction).. .............................................................................17
SECT. XIV. (Bad influence of popular religions on morality). ...........................................................24
SECT. XV. (General Corollary).. .........................................................................................................26
i
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
David Hume
This page copyright © 2001 Blackmask Online.
http://www.blackmask.com
·
INTRODUCTION
As every enquiry, which regards religion, is of the utmost importance, there are two questions in particular,
which challenge our attention, to wit, that concerning its foundation in reason, and that concerning its origin
in human nature. Happily, the first question, which is the most important, admits of the most obvious, at least,
the clearest solution. The whole frame of nature bespeaks an intelligent author; and no rational enquirer can,
after serious reflection, suspend his belief a moment with regard to the primary principles of genuine Theism
and Religion. But the other question, concerning the origin of religion in human nature, is exposed to some
more difficulty. The belief of invisible, intelligent power has been very generally diffused over the human
race, in all places and in all ages; but it has neither perhaps been so universal as to admit of no exception, nor
has it been, in any degree, uniform in the ideas, which it has suggested. Some nations have been discovered,
who entertained no sentiments of Religion, if travellers and historians may be credited; and no two nations,
and scarce any two men, have ever agreed precisely in the same sentiments. It would appear, therefore, that
this preconception springs not from an original instinct or primary impression of nature, such as gives rise to
self−love, affection between the sexes, love of progeny, gratitude, resentment; since every instinct of this
kind has been found absolutely universal in all nations and ages, and has always a precise determinate object,
which it inflexibly pursues. The first religious principles must be secondary; such as may easily be perverted
by various accidents and causes, and whose operation too, in some cases, may, by an extraordinary
concurrence of circumstances, be altogether prevented. What those principles are, which give rise to the
original belief, and what those accidents and causes are, which direct its operation, is the subject of our
present enquiry.
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
1
 
 
 
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
SECT. I. (That Polytheism was the primary Religion of Men).
It appears to me, that, if we consider the improvement of human society, from rude beginnings to a state of
greater perfection, polytheism or idolatry was, and necessarily must have been, the first and most ancient
religion of mankind. This opinion I shall endeavour to confirm by the following arguments.
It is a matter of fact incontestable, that about 1700 years ago all mankind were polytheists. The doubtful and
sceptical principles of a few philosophers, or the theism, and that too not entirely pure, of one or two nations,
form no objection worth regarding. Behold then the clear testimony of history. The farther we mount up into
antiquity, the more do we find mankind plunged into polytheism. No marks, no symptoms of any more
perfect religion. The most ancient records of human race still present us with that system as the popular and
established creed. The north, the south, the east, the west, give their unanimous testimony to the same fact.
What can be opposed to so full an evidence?
As far as writing or history reaches, mankind, in ancient times, appear universally to have been polytheists.
Shall we assert, that, in more ancient times, before the knowledge of letters, or the discovery of any art or
science, men entertained the principles of pure theism? That is, while they were ignorant and barbarous, they
discovered truth: But fell into error, as soon as they acquired learning and politeness.
But in this assertion you not only contradict all appearance of probability, but also our present experience
concerning the principles and opinions of barbarous nations. The savage tribes of AMERICA, AFRICA, and
ASIA are all idolaters. Not a single exception to this rule. Insomuch, that, were a traveller to transport himself
into any unknown region; if he found inhabitants cultivated with arts and science, though even upon that
supposition there are odds against their being theists, yet could he not safely, till farther inquiry, pronounce
any thing on that head: But if he found them ignorant and barbarous, he might beforehand declare them
idolaters; and there scarcely is a possibility of his being mistaken.
It seems certain, that, according to the natural progress of human thought, the ignorant multitude must first
entertain some groveling and familiar notion of superior powers, before they stretch their conception to that
perfect Being, who bestowed order on the whole frame of nature. We may as reasonably imagine, that men
inhabited palaces before huts and cottages, or studied geometry before agriculture; as assert that the Deity
appeared to them a pure spirit, omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent, before he was apprehended to be a
powerful, though limited being, with human passions and appetites, limbs and organs. The mind rises
gradually, from inferior to superior: By abstracting from what is imperfect, it forms an idea of perfection:
And slowly distinguishing the nobler parts of its own frame from the grosser, it learns to transfer only the
former, much elevated and refined, to its divinity. Nothing could disturb this natural progress of thought, but
some obvious and invincible argument, which might immediately lead the mind into the pure principles of
theism, and make it overleap, at one bound, the vast interval which is interposed between the human and the
divine nature. But though I allow, that the order and frame of the universe, when accurately examined,
affords such an argument; yet I can never think, that this consideration could have an influence on mankind,
when they formed their first rude notions of religion.
The causes of such objects, as are quite familiar to us, never strike our attention or curiosity; and however
extraordinary or surprising these objects in themselves, they are passed over, by the raw and ignorant
multitude, without much examination or enquiry. ADAM, rising at once, in paradise, and in the full
perfection of his faculties, would naturally, as represented by MILTON, be astonished at the glorious
appearances of nature, the heavens, the air, the earth, his own organs and members; and would be led to ask,
whence this wonderful scene arose. But a barbarous, necessitous animal (such as a man is on the first origin
of society), pressed by such numerous wants and passions, has no leisure to admire the regular face of nature,
or make enquiries concerning the cause of those objects, to which from his infancy he has been gradually
SECT. I. (That Polytheism was the primary Religion of Men).
2
 
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RELIGION
accustomed. On the contrary, the more regular and uniform, that is, the more perfect nature appears, the more
is he familiarized to it, and the less inclined to scrutinize and examine it. A monstrous birth excites his
curiosity, and is deemed a prodigy. It alarms him from its novelty; and immediately sets him a trembling, and
sacrificing, and praying. But an animal, compleat in all its limbs and organs, is to him an ordinary spectacle,
and produces no religious opinion or affection. Ask him, whence that animal arose; he will tell you, from the
copulation of its parents. And these, whence? From the copulation of theirs. A few removes satisfy his
curiosity, and set the objects at such a distance, that he entirely loses sight of them. Imagine not, that he will
so much as start the question, whence the first animal; much less, whence the whole system or united fabric
of the universe arose. Or, if you start such a question to him, expect not, that he will employ his mind with
any anxiety about a subject, so remote, so uninteresting, and which so much exceeds the bounds of his
capacity.
But farther, if men were at first led into the belief of one Supreme Being, by reasoning from the frame of
nature, they could never possibly leave that belief, in order to embrace polytheism; but the same principles of
reason, which at first produced and diffused over mankind, so magnificent an opinion, must be able, with
greater facility, to preserve it. The first invention and proof of any doctrine is much more difficult than the
supporting and retaining of it.
There is a great difference between historical facts and speculative opinions; nor is the knowledge of the one
propagated in the same manner with that of the other. An historical fact, while it passes by oral tradition from
eye−witnesses and contemporaries, is disguised in every successive narration, and may at last retain but very
small, if any, resemblance of the original truth, on which it was founded. The frail memories of men, their
love of exaggeration, their supine carelessness; these principles, if not corrected by books and writing, soon
pervert the account of historical events; where argument or reasoning has little or no place, nor can ever recal
the truth, which has once escaped those narrations. It is thus the fables of HERCULES, THESEUS,
BACCHUS are supposed to have been originally founded in true history, corrupted by tradition. But with
regard to speculative opinions, the case is far otherwise. If these opinions be founded on arguments so clear
and obvious as to carry conviction with the generality of mankind, the same arguments, which at first
diffused the opinions, will still preserve them in their original purity. If the arguments be more abstruse, and
more remote from vulgar apprehension, the opinions will always be confined to a few persons; and as soon as
men leave the contemplation of the arguments, the opinions will immediately be lost and be buried in
oblivion. Whichever side of this dilemma we take, it must appear impossible, that theism could, from
reasoning, have been the primary religion of human race, and have afterwards, by its corruption, given birth
to polytheism and to all the various superstitions of the heathen world. Reason, when obvious, prevents these
corruptions: When abstruse, it keeps the principles entirely from the knowledge of the vulgar, who are alone
liable to corrupt any principle or opinion.
SECT. II. (Origin of Polytheism).
If we would, therefore, indulge our curiosity, in enquiring concerning the origin of religion, we must turn our
thoughts towards polytheism, the primitive religion of uninstructed mankind.
Were men led into the apprehension of invisible, intelligent power by a contemplation of the works of nature,
they could never possibly entertain any conception but of one single being, who bestowed existence and order
on this vast machine, and adjusted all its parts, according to one regular plan or connected system. For
though, to persons of a certain turn of mind, it may not appear altogether absurd, that several independent
beings, endowed with superior wisdom, might conspire in the contrivance and execution of one regular plan;
yet is this a merely arbitrary supposition, which, even if allowed possible, must be confessed neither to be
supported by probability nor necessity. All things in the universe are evidently of a piece. Every thing is
adjusted to every thing. One design prevails throughout the whole. And this uniformity leads the mind to
SECT. II. (Origin of Polytheism).
3
 

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika:

Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin