Volume 49 - Issue 5.pdf

(3560 KB) Pobierz
untitled
W.-Y. Cheng
H.-T. Lee
M.-H. Sun
C.-C. Shen
A Pterion Keyhole Approach for the Treatment of
Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Abstract
comes wider in the deep area, providing sufficient space for
microscope-assisted surgery without the need for highly specia-
lized instruments.
The supraorbital keyhole approach is most frequently used in
treatment for lesions within the anterior cranial base. However,
it has some drawbacks, including cosmetically poor appearance
of the scar, forehead deformity, and difficulty in dealing with
some kinds of middle cerebral artery (MCA) and internal carotid
artery (ICA) aneurysms. Therefore, we have developed a small
pterion keyhole approach for an alternative access to treat ante-
rior circulation aneurysms. An oblique skin incision about
3 5 cm in length was made just from 1.0 cm anterior to the
superficial temporal artery at the level of the zygomatic arch,
curved just below the temporal line to the forehead, and stopped
at the hairline over the sylvian fissure. Then a small craniotomy
(2 3 cm) was made just over the sylvian fissure and the aneur-
ysms were exposed through the lateral cerebral fissure. We used
this approach to treat 40 patients with aneurysms located in
posterior communicating arteries (n = 14), the MCA (n = 10), the
anterior communicating arteries (n = 9), the anterior cerebral
artery (n = 1), the ophthalmic arteries (n = 3), and the ICA
(n = 3). The general outcome of all patients was good without
serious complications from the surgical technique even though 3
cases underwent intraoperative premature rupture of the aneu-
rysms. No approach-related complication occurred except that
one patient had vasospasm 2 days after the aneurysm clipping.
In conclusion, this pterion keyhole approach can achieve the best
operative effect for the treatment of intracranial anterior circula-
tion aneurysms in a selective group of patients with several
advantages over traditional craniotomy including minor tissue
damage, less brain retraction, a superior cosmetic result, and
shorter duration of surgery. Moreover, the operative field be-
Key words
Intracranial aneurysms keyhole minimally invasive pterion
Introduction
The most definitive treatment for intracranial aneurysms is
surgical clipping. In most cases, a frontotemporal craniotomy is
required. Although this is tolerated well by most patients, reduc-
ing the size of the opening would be beneficial. Recent advances
in minimally invasive technique and instrumentation permit
certain intracranial aneurysms to be treated using very small
openings. These so-called ‘‘keyhole’’ openings have been used for
exposure of lesions within the anterior cranial base [1–5]. Po-
tential advantages of these approaches include reduced opera-
tive morbidity, expeditious patient recovery, and cost
effectiveness in case management. However, the keyhole ap-
proach is not appropriate for every aneurysm. Only selected
patients can benefit from this innovative approach. The mini-
craniotomy used in these approaches sometimes requires the
use of special instrumentation. In various keyhole procedures,
the supraorbital approach is most frequently applied for the
treatment of supratentorial aneurysms. However, this procedure
has some problems including cosmetically poor appearance of
the scar, forehead deformity, and difficulty in dealing some types
257
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Correspondence
Chiung-Chyi Shen, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery Taichung Veterans General Hospital 160, Sec. 3,
Taichung-Kang Road Taichung Taiwan Republic of China Tel./Fax: + 886/4/23 74 12 18
E-mail: ns@vghtc.gov.tw
Bibliography
Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 257–262 r Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York
DOI 10.1055/s-2006-954575
ISSN 0946-7211
377234964.002.png
Table 1 Location of aneurysms in 40 patients
Table 2 Hunt and Hess grade and Fisher grade of the patients
(n = 40)
Location of
aneurysm
ICA ACA ACoA PCoA MCA Ophthalmic
artery
Grade
I
II
III
IV
V
Number of
patients
3
1
9
14
10
3
Hunt and Hess
18
17
5
0
0
Fisher
22
14
4
0
ICA = internal carotid artery; ACA = anterior cerebral artery; AcoA = anterior
communicating artery; PcoA = posterior communicating artery; MCA = mid-
dle cerebral artery.
of middle cerebral artery (MCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA)
aneurysms. In this article, the authors present an interesting
keyhole approach to treat anterior circulation aneurysms via a
pterion minicraniotomy.
this musculocutaneous flap may conceal a portion of the middle
fossa.
Craniotomy
With a high-speed bone drill, a small burr hole was made at the
temporal bone near the posterior margin of the zygomatic arch
(Fig. 1b). Then a craniotomy was made with a width of 2 3.5 cm
and height of 1.5 2 cm. It was limited by the sphenoid ridge
anteriorly, the suprameatal crest posteriorly, the zygomatic arch
inferiorly, and the squamosal suture superiorly. After craniot-
omy, a groove over the sphenoid ridge of the bone flap was made
and fractured manually to remove the bone flap (Fig. 1c). This
would allow easier control of bleeding from the middle menin-
geal artery. For access to the sylvian fissure, 1 2 cm of the
temporal lobe was exposed by extending the craniotomy to the
floor of the frontal fossa just above the orbital rim, exposing 2 cm
of the frontal lobe (especially for ACA or ACoA aneurysm), and
retracting the frontal lobe away from the MCA. If the extent of
the frontal fossa exposure was inadequate, it might hamper
visualization up into the sylvian fissure and force the surgeon
to retract the temporal lobe inordinately. A rongeur or a high-
speed drill was then used to remove the bones along the cranial
base, including a portion of the squamous temporal bone and the
sphenoid edge of the greater sphenoid wing. The dura was
opened with an arched fashion around the sylvian fissure,
flapped anteriorly, and tacked over the sphenoid ridge (Fig. 1d).
Oozing from the pterion might be problematic and was usually
reduced with tenting stitches and packing. Spinal drainage, if
needed, was begun as the dura was opened.
Patient and Methods
258
Patients and criteria
From March 1999 to December 2004, we clipped 40 intracranial
aneurysms of the anterior circulation via a pterion keyhole
approach. The aneurysmal locations included 14 posterior com-
municating arteries (PCoA), 10 MCAs, 9 anterior communicating
arteries (ACoA), 1 anterior cerebral artery (ACA), 3 ophthalmic
arteries, and 3 ICAs (Table 1). The patients were selected on the
basis of the following criteria: Hunt and Hess Grades I through
III, and subarachnoid hemorrhage evaluated as Fisher Grades I
through III (Table 2). The patients comprised 24 females and 16
males with an average age of 57.4 years (ranged from 33 to 84
years). Twenty-five patients presented with subarachnoid he-
morrhage (SAH), of whom twenty received early operation and
five received delayed operation. Fifteen aneurysms without rup-
ture received a regular operation. For releasing intracranial
pressure and making the minicraniotomy easy, a lumbar drain-
age tube was inserted to drain the cerebrospinal fluid in some
cases. The pterion keyhole approach was performed as we have
previously described [6] and is detailed below.
Head position and skin incision
Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in a supine
position and immobilized with sandbags. The head was rotated
to the side contralateral to the operative field so that the ipsi-
lateral sylvian fissure and sphenoid ridge are oriented vertically.
This rotation usually required turning of the patient’s head by
approximately 30 60 degrees according to the location of the
aneurysm. In addition to rotation, the vertex of the head was
placed downward, allowing the surgeon to see into the sylvian
fissure later. Finally, the head and neck were elevated to improve
venous drainage. The ipsilateral shoulder was elevated with a
cushion beneath to keep the zygomatic arch horizontal. An
oblique skin incision about 3 5 cm in length was made just from
1.0 cm anterior to the superficial temporal artery at the level of
the zygomatic arch, anteriorly curved just below the temporal
line to the forehead, and stopped at the hairline (Fig. 1a). To
expose the skull, the scalp and temporal muscle were incised,
dissected and fixed with elastic retraction. The temporal muscle
near the edge of its insertion to the temporal bone was cut
together with the skin flap. This procedure resulted in excellent
exposure of the anterior and middle cranial base, even though
Although a small portion of the incision extended to the fore-
head, it gave a more excellent cosmetic result than the supraor-
bital keyhole approach and provided sufficient frontal exposure
for visualization deep into the sylvian fissure. This procedure
allows the surgeon to work in the anterior and middle cranial
fossa, the intracranial extradural space, and the subarachnoid
space. Under the microscope, the neurosurgeon could easily gain
a short access to the surgical targets in the suprasellar and
tentorial areas, the circle of Willis, and the whole anterior cranial
base. The pterion keyhole approach has the potential for access
to aneurysms and related structures at the following sites: the
ipsilateral ICA, the medial wall of the contralateral ICA, the ACoA,
bilateral ophthalmic arteries, the M1, M2, and M3 segments of
the ipsilateral MCA, the contralateral PCoA, the anterior choroi-
dal artery, the P1 segment of the PCA, the suprasellar and
tentorial areas, all the anterior cranial base structures, and the
basilar apex. In some selected aneurysm cases, 0- and 30-degree
endoscopic control was used (HSW Co., Tuttlingen, Germany) to
confirm the patency of neighboring perforating arteries, the
PCoA, and the anterior choroidal artery.
Cheng W-Y et al. A Pterion Keyhole Approach ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 257–262
377234964.003.png
259
Fig. 1 Surgical procedure of pterion keyhole approach. a The skin incision line was 1.0 cm anterior to the superficial temporal artery at the level
of the zygomatic arch, anteriorly curved just below the temporal line to the forehead, and stopped at the hairline. b A small burr hole was made at
the temporal bone near the posterior margin of the zygomatic arch. c A groove (indicated by arrows) over the sphenoid ridge was made and the
bony flap was removed. d The dura was opened in an arched fashion around the sylvian fissure and turned over anteriorly.
After clipping the aneurysms, the surgical wound was then
closed layer by layer. It was noted that the temporal muscle must
be reattached to the cranium otherwise it might produce a
distinguishable bulge above the zygoma and postoperative fore-
head swelling and ecchymosis.
Table 3 Glasgow outcome scale of the patients (n = 40)
Score
5
4
3
2
1
Number of patients
37
2
0
1
0
Results
No patient had postoperative visual or retinal disturbances with
regard to either visual acuity or visual field impairment.
All of the aneurysms were clipped successfully and uneventfully.
The overall outcome was good (Table 3), except for one patient
who suffered complications of vasospasm and cerebral infarction
2 days after aneurysm clipping. No serious complications and
mortality related to the surgical technique were noted. The
surgical space afforded by use of this approach allows wide
exploration of the anterior fossa, the orbital space, and the
ipsilateral middle fossa structures without limitations. It also
allowed access to portions of the contralateral ICA and its
bifurcation. Three patients showed premature rupture during
dissection of the aneurysmal neck including one each of the
ACoA, PCoA and MCA. However, they were successfully clipped.
All patients sustained transient hypesthesia over the temporal
region, which is expected and acceptable with the use of this
approach and is not considered as a complication. The post-
operative cosmetic result was excellent and the patients were
satisfied with it (Fig. 2). After 7 to 50 months of follow-up, we
found that only 3 patients had temporomandibular dysfunction
or signs of atrophy at the site of the craniotomy.
Discussion
Since Yasargil and Fox first described the frontotemporal cra-
niotomy with a pterional approach, it has replaced bifrontal and
Cheng W-Y et al. A Pterion Keyhole Approach ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 257–262
377234964.004.png
Fig. 2 The case of a right ophthalmic artery
aneurysm treated by the pterion keyhole
approach. a An aneurysm of the right
ophthalmic artery under the microscope.
b Clipping of the aneurysm. c Appearance
of the incision one week after surgery.
d Appearance of the incision two months
after surgery. The cosmetic result was good.
260
frontolateral craniotomies for access to aneurysms of the ante-
rior circulation. A common feature of all these conventional
approaches is the relatively extensive brain exposure and brain
retraction, causing an increase of surgical morbidity not related
to the lesion itself. Occasionally, patients complain of the de-
pressed deformities in the frontotemporal area due to craniot-
omy. Particularly, this occurs as a result of inappropriate repair of
the bone defect at the burr holes. Although application of some
biocompatible materials including hydroxyapatite ceramics [7],
burr-hole buttons and miniplate systems [8, 9] can prevent this
deformity to some extent, it does not fit well to a bone defect at
the keyhole because of the complex curvature of the surrounding
bone.
frontotemporal craniotomy is always visible unless it is made
within the eyebrow. Even for an incisionwithin the eyebrow, hair
loss at the margin of the incision may make it more visible. In
contrast, a scalp incision for a pterion keyhole is entirely behind
the hairline unless the patient is bald. Although any cosmetic
problems caused by burr holes drilled during surgery have been
largely eliminated by the use of plating systems and burr-hole
covers, scalp and cosmetic deformities should be avoided. Ad-
ditionally, the keyhole approach to cerebral aneurysms requires
a slack brain and may be associated with a higher risk of
devastating consequences due to unexpected conditions during
surgery because of the narrower surgical fields than in a stan-
dard pterional craniotomy. This technique, therefore, is recom-
mended for well-trained neurosurgeons having experience in
conventional craniotomy techniques, because avoidance of brain
injury should be more of a concern to a neurosurgeon than the
length of the skin incision.
Since the implementation of the minimally invasive concept in
neurosurgery is to avoid surgical trauma, many surgical ap-
proaches and technological advances have been made to facil-
itate this goal. The clinical results are overwhelming. Shorter
hospital stay and less morbidity and mortality are achieved with
minimally invasive approaches. Also, minimally invasive ex-
ploration through a small keyhole [10,11] or endoscope-assisted
supraorbital craniotomy [12–14], using an eyebrow or a super-
ciliary skin incision, has become more widely performed with
the improvement of diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques.
Supraorbital keyhole craniotomy seems to cause less injury to
soft tissue and offers excellent cosmetic results compared to the
conventional frontotemporal craniotomy. The skin incision for a
Advantages of the pterion keyhole approach
The pterion keyhole approach offers several advantages com-
pared to a conventional frontotemporal craniotomy. First of all,
brain exposure to air, accidental surgical trauma and brain
retraction is minimal. This significantly decreases approach-
related surgical morbidity and shortens hospitalization. Time
spent in the surgical procedure is also significantly reduced
when compared to standard techniques. The primary benefit of
the pterion keyhole approach seems to be the avoidance of
Cheng W-Y et al. A Pterion Keyhole Approach ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 257–262
377234964.005.png
resection of the orbital rim and roof, and frontal sinus, which
would ultimately lead to a decreased incidence of cerebrospinal
fluid leakage and may result in less cosmetic deformity and less
discomfort than produced by supraorbital or transorbital ap-
proaches. The authors have demonstrated that, in a selected
group of patients, the pterion keyhole approach is a viable
alternative to the traditional pterion approach.
the center of the pterion just over the sylvian fissure. Such an
incision method provided a superior postoperative cosmetic
appearance, because the pterion keyhole was well covered by
the temporal muscle. To avoid damage to the temporal muscle
and the frontal branch of the facial nerve, we cut the temporal
muscle near the edge of its insertion to the temporal bone. This
prevented atrophy of the temporal muscle, temporomandibular
joint problems, indentation of the temple, weakness of the
frontal muscle, eyelid droop, and cosmetic anomalies likely
caused by other cutting methods. Although the pterion keyhole
approach requires a limited skin incision and a small trephinated
bone opening, this approach allowed a short access to the
suprasellar area through the keyhole. Moreover, the operative
field became wider as it went deeper. Accordingly, sufficient
operative space was obtained requiring no highly specialized
instruments.
Disadvantages and limitations of the pterion keyhole
approach
Due to the small craniotomy, there is less opportunity to change
the surgical plan if unexpected conditions occur during surgery.
Because brain swelling was difficult to manage with the pterion
keyhole approach, we did not adopt this approach for patients
with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hess and Hunt grades IV
V) without hydrocephalus. Furthermore, an unexpected in-
traoperative serious rupture of the aneurysm would be ex-
tremely difficult to manage under the limited exposure of the
brain by this approach. We prevented this catastrophic event by
adequate exposure of the sylvian fissure and its vascular anat-
omy, as well as CSF drainage. Actually, for each patient, we had
evaluated whether the pterion keyhole approach allowed for
proximal control, dissection of the aneurysm, and application
of the aneurysmal clip in advance. Multidirectional viewing
through the keyhole was only achievable by use of intraoperative
endoscopy. Therefore, preoperative diagnostic imaging is of
paramount importance in reference to the surgical planning
and for preventing the occurrence of unexpected intraoperative
conditions in advance. The pterion keyhole approach for ACoA
aneurysms has drawbacks. A limited resection of the gyrus
rectus is often necessary for adequate control of the AcoA
aneurysms [15].
Application in neurovascular surgery
One of the commonest drawbacks of keyhole approaches in
neurovascular surgery is the risk of bleeding. However, the key-
hole procedures were carefully executed with consideration of
the essential factors regarding aneurysm dissection, including
individual anatomy, proximal vessels (flow control), distal ves-
sels, neck and dome of the aneurysm, and perforating vessels.
Thus, the usual microsurgical space of 20mm at the site of the
lesion is ultimately the same as that required in a large craniot-
omy, without compromising the manipulation of aneurysm
clipping and, especially, without increasing the risk for the
patient. Even though clinoid resection was not necessary for
aneurysms in the paraclinoid segment or carotid cavum in some
of our cases, the above point still works and has been document-
ed in previous experimental studies [5,11,16,17].
261
Surgical flexibility
The pterion keyhole approach is an alternative in the treatment
of patients with anterior circulation aneurysms in a wide ana-
tomic area, either ipsilaterally or contralaterally. One of the
important advantages of the approach is minimal brain retrac-
tion, which is achieved in three ways:
It is possible to gain access to the region of the tip of the basilar
artery with appropriate microdrilling of the posterior clinoid. In
those aneurysms with a ventral neck, a postural change to a more
lateral angle allows better visualization than does the keyhole
supraorbital approach. With regard to the limitation of axial
illumination at 0-degree microscopic visualization, it is also
possible to use an endoscope with 0 and 30 degree optics to
verify the anatomic position of the neighboring arteries, the
PCoA, the anterior choroidal artery, and the perforating arteries
in the supraclinoid segment of the lCA. The procedure is safe
under three-dimensional verification of the clip position. A
second placement of the clip was necessary in only three of our
cases.
– changes of the approaching angle when the minicraniotomy
is shifted to the frontal area, allowing access to the bilateral
optic nerves;
– dissection and cistern drainage that is possible at all levels of
the brain and, for approaching the sylvian fissure, is possible
at the pre-pontine cistern; and
– modification of the head position with postural support of
gravity permitting access to all of the natural spaces in this
microsurgical corridor.
Improvement of surgical technique
Perneczky and colleagues [1, 5] have advocated the keyhole
concept in neurosurgery and have used the supraorbital mini-
craniotomy extensively for a variety of lesions. Recently, others
have reported experience with this approach in the management
of tumors and aneurysms of the anterior cranial fossa and the
sellar and parasellar regions [2–5].
The pterion keyhole approach allowed for a craniotomy of up to
3.5 cm in diameter, approximately 1.5 cm wider than that ob-
tained using the supraorbital keyhole approach. The larger cra-
niotomy was particularly important because it increased the
field of illumination and visualization under the surgical micro-
scope, avoided total reliance on the endoscope, and decreased
the potential obstruction of light by the surgical instruments.
The drawbacks of supraorbital keyhole approach are:
The pterion keyhole approach required a 3- to 5-cm long oblique
skin incision extending from the edge of the zygomatic arch to
– transient loss of supraorbital sensation that frequently oc-
curs and is attributed to traction on the supraorbital nerve;
Cheng W-Y et al. A Pterion Keyhole Approach ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 257–262
377234964.001.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin