CVO_013.pdf

(691 KB) Pobierz
No. 13, April 1, 2009
OPENINGS
WHAT’S HOT AND WHAT’S NOT?
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQK+-TR0
9+L+N+PVL-0
9P+PVLP+-ZP0
9+P+-+-ZP-0
9-+PZPP+-+0
9+-SN-+-+-0
9PZP-+LZPPZP0
9TR-+Q+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
The latest news in the
Anti-Moscow Gambit
By IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris
Frequency
This week we have a inal look at the Amber Rapid
and Blindfold tournament where Kramnik saved up
his best novelty for the last round. We also checked
the German and Dutch Leagues.
WHAT’S HOT?
1.e4 lost its magic towards the end in Nice. Out of the blue Black
won three games with the Sicilian Kan Variation. Kamsky-Topalov
and Topalov-Kamsky strangely enough were very similar with White
taking on a6 and Black playing ¤f3! to open up the long diagonal
for ¥a8. Morozevich beat Anand with 1.e4 d6 2.d4 ¤f6 3.¤c3 e5!?,
which we explain below. Last week’s Game of the Week Karjakin-
Morozevich with Black allowing ¤c7+ was repeated in Kamsky-
Morozevich, with White playing the novelty 9.£e1!?.
Score
More positive news for the king’s pawn opening in the Dutch League
where national champion Jan Smeets put the Open Ruy Lopez
under theoretical pressure.
Moving on to 1.d4, the Semi-Slav was avoided in Nice during most
of the tournament, but towards the end it was played five times.
Black kept himself comfortably in the Moscow Variation (6.¥xf6), but
in our Game of the Week he suffered a painful defeat in the Anti-
Moscow Gambit (6.¥h4). In the diagram position White has many
dangerous moves and Black has to be prepared for all of them.
In the German league some Avrukh analysis on the Queen’s Gambit
Accepted was tested in Khenkin-Gharamian.
Source: Megabase + TWIC, 2500+ only
Looking back at the Amber tournament we have to conclude that the French Defence, a very popular opening at club level, is not very
hot at the moment. The only game played with it in Nice, was duly won by White. In this
week’s grandmaster games with the French taken together, White mostly played 3.¤d2 (all
following Topalov!?), whereas 3.¤c3 is still the most critical move theoretically speaking.
WHAT’S NOT?
1 of 3
788960157.051.png 788960157.055.png 788960157.056.png 788960157.057.png 788960157.001.png 788960157.002.png 788960157.003.png 788960157.004.png 788960157.005.png 788960157.006.png 788960157.007.png 788960157.008.png 788960157.009.png 788960157.010.png 788960157.011.png 788960157.012.png 788960157.013.png 788960157.014.png 788960157.015.png 788960157.016.png 788960157.017.png 788960157.018.png 788960157.019.png 788960157.020.png 788960157.021.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 13, April 1, 2009
Deep Kramnik preparation in the Anti-Moscow
Kramnik inished his Amber tournament with a strong inal sprint that resulted in a shared
second spot with Anand. In the last round the former World Champion used some very deep
opening preparation in his game against Leko. A new blow for the Anti-Moscow?
GAME OF THE WEEK
Kramnik,V (2759) - Leko, P (2751)
Nice (Amber blindfold), 26 March 2009
D43 Semi-Slav, Anti-Moscow Gambit, 9.¥e2
only after 17.axb5 (17.¥g4 h5!) 17...axb5 18.d5
the freeing 18...¥f8.
17.¥g4 ¦d8 18.axb5N
The database mentions a blitz game between
Kramnik and Shirov with the notation stopping
after 18.¤d5 (draw). If that s correct, the text is
the first new move.
18...axb5 19.¥xf8 ¢xf8
After 19...¤xf8 20.¦a7! any exd4 gets answered
by e5! and the ¢ is stuck on e8.
20.¥xd7 ¦xd7 21.dxe5 £e6 22.£h5 £xe5
Maybe Black should try to confuse the issue
with 22...b4!?
23.f4!
Opening the f-file for the rooks.
23...£xf4 24.¦f1 £e5 25.¦f5 £e6 26.¦af1 ¢g7
26...¦h7 looks like a more stubborn defence, since
the black ¢ stays away from potential ¤ checks.
27.¤e2!
The knight is joining in for a direct attack on the
enemy king.
27...¦f8 28.¤g3
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-TR-+0
9+L+R+PMK-0
9-+P+Q+-ZP0
9+P+-+RZPQ0
9-+P+P+-+0
9+-+-+-SN-0
9-ZP-+-+PZP0
9+-+-+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
14.¥h5 ¥f8 15.¥xf8 ¦xf8 16.e5 £b6 was proven
to be OK for Black in some important games
by Anand. After 14.¦e1 Black can choose
between 14...¥f8 and the sharper 14...c5!?. A
very direct approach is 14.e5 c5 15.¥h5 ¥f8
16.d5, but analysis suggests that Black is fine,
starting with 16...¥xd6. Miton s 14.b4 hasn t got
any more testing since it was first played and
CVO editor Ris invented yet another option with
14.d5!? which brought a quick attacking win:
14...¤e5 15.dxe6 ¤d3 16.e5 ¥xe5 17.exf7+
¢xf7 18.¥h5+ ¢g7 19.¥xe5+ ¤xe5 20.£e2
¤g6 21.¦ad1 £c7 22.¥xg6 ¢xg6 23.£e6+ ¢h5
24.¤e4 ¥c8 25.¤g3+ 1–0 Ris-Kvisla, Gibraltar
2007.
14...e5 15.¦e1!?
A very tricky new attempt to refute the whole
black setup. 15.d5 c5 16.b4 £b6 17.bxc5 ¤xc5
18.¥xc5 £xc5 19.axb5 axb5 20.¦xa8+ ¥xa8
21.£a1 0–0 22.£a5 ¦b8 23.¦b1 ¥f8 was OK for
Black in Gustafsson-Aronian, Khanty Mansiysk
2007. 15.¥g4 exd4 16.e5 c5 17.¦e1 (17.¥f3
¤xe5! 18.¥xb7 £xd6 19.¥xa8 0–0 gives Black
good compensation for the rook) 17...¤xe5!
18.¥xe5 0–0 19.¥xg7 ¢xg7 20.¤e2 f5 21.¥h5
f4 22.b4 was played in Kramnik-Aronian, Wijk
aan Zee 2008, which was eventually won by
White after 110 moves. Here 22...d3!? 23.bxc5
b4 has been suggested by Anand and actually
Black s position looks very attractive.
15...£f6
15...exd4 16.e5! dxc3 17.¥h5! is the point of
White s previous move, which is worked out
in the Rybka 3 book: 17...¤f8 18.£f3 £d7
19.e6 ¤xe6 20.¦xe6+! ¢d8 21.¥xf7 c2 (21...
cxb2 22.¦d1 ¢c8 23.¦e7 £xd6 24.£f5+ ¢b8
25.¦xd6+-) 22.¥g3 ¥xb2 23.¦ae1+-. Black
does have an interesting alternative in 15...h5!?
followed by ¦h6! to battle the dominating bishop
on d6.
16.¥a3 ¥f8
Black should consider starting with 16...¦d8 and
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 d5 4.¤c3 c6
After an interesting move order we have landed
in the Semi-Slav.
5.¥g5 h6 6.¥h4
The Anti-Moscow Gambit. In Nice Black scored
2.5 out of 4 after 6.¥xf6 £xf6 7.e3 ¤d7 8.¥d3
dxc4 9.¥xc4 g6!.
6...dxc4 7.e4 g5 8.¥g3 b5 9.¥e2
For 9.¤e5 h5 10.h4 g4 11.¥e2 b4!? see CVO 4
whereas 11...¥b7 transposes to the next note.
9...¥b7 10.0–0
10.h4 g4 11.¤e5 h5 12.0–0 ¤bd7 13.£c2
(13.¤xf7!? is the Bosboom treatment of the
position, which he qualified as “maybe not
correct, but quite difficult for Black to handle”.
More can be found in the PGN file.) 13...¤xe5
14.¥xe5 ¥g7 15.b3!? (15.¦ad1 and 15.¥g3!?
are the alternatives) 15...0–0! was the strong
novelty from Grischuk-Aronian, Linares 2009,
mentioned in CVO 9.
10...¤bd7 11.¤e5 ¥g7
Kramnik himself played 11...¥b4!? against
Miton at the Olympiad, Dresden 2008.
12.¤xd7
In CVO 0 we analysed 12.¤xf7!? from the famous
game Topalov-Kramnik, Wijk aan Zee 2008.
12...¤xd7 13.¥d6 a6
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQK+-TR0
9+L+N+PVL-0
9P+PVLP+-ZP0
9+P+-+-ZP-0
9-+PZPP+-+0
9+-SN-+-+-0
9PZP-+LZPPZP0
9TR-+Q+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
Amazingly, so far this was all preparation by
Kramnik, some stuff he had already looked at
before the World Championship in Mexico 2007.
28...c5 29.¦f6!
After the following exchange, the white queen
and knight are a killing attacking duo.
29...£xf6 30.¦xf6 ¢xf6 31.£xh6+ ¢e7
32.¤f5+ ¢e8 33.¤d6+ ¢e7 34.e5 ¦g8 35.£f6+
¢f8 36.e6 1–0
KRAMNIK - LEKO
14.a4
2 of 3
788960157.022.png 788960157.023.png 788960157.024.png 788960157.025.png 788960157.026.png 788960157.027.png 788960157.028.png 788960157.029.png 788960157.030.png 788960157.031.png 788960157.032.png 788960157.033.png 788960157.034.png 788960157.035.png 788960157.036.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 13, April 1, 2009
THIS WEEK’S HARVEST
Open Ruy Lopez, 9.¤bd2
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+-TRK+0
9+-+-+PZPP0
9P+-+-+-+0
9+PZPQZPNVL-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+PZP-+-ZP-0
9-ZP-ZPRZP-ZP0
9+R+Q+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4
¤f6 5.0–0 ¤xe4 6.d4 b5 7.¥b3 d5
8.dxe5 ¥e6 9.¤bd2 ¤c5 10.c3 ¥e7
11.¥c2 d4 12.¤b3 d3 13.¥b1 ¤xb3
14.axb3 ¥f5 15.¥e3 0–0 16.¦e1 £d5
17.¥d4 d2 18.¦e2 ¥xb1 19.¦xb1 ¤xd4
20.¤xd4 ¥g5 21.g3 c5 22.¤f5
Caro-Kann Advance
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+KVLNTR0
9ZPP+-+PZPP0
9-+N+P+-+0
9+-ZPPZPL+-0
9-+-ZP-+-+0
9+-SN-VLN+-0
9PWQP+LZPPZP0
9TR-+Q+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 ¥f5
4.¤f3 e6 5.¥e2 c5 6.¥e3 £b6
7.¤c3 ¤c6 8.0–0 £xb2
Philidor, rare lines
XIIIIIIIIY
9-TRLWQ-TRK+0
9ZP-+NVLPZPP0
9-+PZP-SN-+0
9+P+-ZP-+-0
9-+-ZPP+-+0
9ZP-SN-+-ZPP0
9-ZPP+NZPL+0
9TR-VLQ+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 d6 2.d4 ¤f6 3.¤c3 e5
4.¤ge2 ¥e7 5.g3 c6 6.¥g2 b5
7.0–0 0–0 8.a3 ¤bd7 9.h3 ¦b8
QGA, 7.¥b3
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+-VL-TR0
9+L+K+PZP-0
9P+-+Q+-+0
9+-+-ZP-VL-0
9PZP-ZP-+-+0
9+-+-+-WQ-0
9-ZP-+-+PZP0
9+-TR-+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 ¤f6 4.¥xc4 e6
5.¤f3 c5 6.0–0 a6 7.¥b3 b5 8.a4 b4
9.e4 ¥b7 10.e5 ¤e4 11.¤bd2 ¤xd2
12.¥xd2 cxd4 13.¤g5 ¤d7 14.f4 ¤c5
15.f5 ¤xb3 16.£xb3 £d5 17.£g3 h6
18.fxe6 hxg5 19.exf7+ ¢d7 20.¦ac1
£e6 21.¥xg5
Last week we saw that in the game
Karjakin-Morozevich, also at the
Amber Tournament, Black was
doing fine after the spectacular
9.¤b5 c4!. We didn't have to wait
long for the next test since Kamsky
tried 9.£e1!? in his last-round
encounter with Morozevich. Of
course we like the brave 9...0–0–0
but after 10.¦b1 £xc2 11.¥b5
Black may have to replace the
game's 11...¥g4 by the developing
11...¤ge7. In the game Kamsky
got a slight plus almost by force,
though the game ended in a draw.
Since Black cannot reach the
classical Philidor with 1.e4 e5 2.¤f3
d6 3.d4 ¤f6 because of 4.dxe5!
¤xe4 5.£d5!, he often tries the
Pirc move order with 1.e4 d6 2.d4
¤f6 3.¤c3 e5!. The ending 4.dxe5
doesn't offer White much and 4.¤f3
allows 4...¤bd7 with a classical
Philidor, so that's why Anand chose
4.¤ge2!? against Morozevich. He
should have continued in style with
10.g4 though, since in the game
he lost the initiative and had to
acknowledge defeat after an ugly
blunder.
11...d4 is known as a very solid
line since the ending after 13.¤xc5
is just a tiny edge for White. With
13.¥b1 the stakes are raised.
Stellwagen-Svetushkin, Dresden
2008 continued 22...£e6 23.¤d6
£g6 24.h4 ¥h6 and now White
could have grabbed the initiative
with 25.h5!. After 22...¦ad8 23.f4 De
Jong couldn't solve Black's problems
either in his game against Smeets.
The diagram position is the final
position on p.449 of Avrukh's
remarkable book Grandmaster
repertoire: 1.d4, volume 1 . Avrukh
concludes "It is hard to believe that
Black can resist this attack" and
while he may still be right, that is
just what Black did in the practical
test Khenkin-Gharamian. Deep
analysis is required to judge moves
like 27.¢f1!?.
OPENING EXPERT
Who: Levon Aronian
Born: October 6, 1982
Nationality: Armenia
Rating:
Expertise:
White: Closed Games
Black: Marshall & Semi-Slav
Why:
Unbeatable with Black, very
2754
dangerous with White
Aronian has won the Amber tournament for the second time in a row. In early interviews he created the impression
that his openings are weak, but just like last week s expert Jan Gustafsson, Aronian plays extremely principled
stuff and is very succesful with it. As an example we give his blindfold game against Radjabov in the PGN.
www.chessvibes.com/openings
ChessVibes Openings is a weekly PDF magazine that covers the latest news on chess openings. Which openings are hot in top level chess?
Which are not? Editors IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris keep you updated once a week! Singles issues cost € 1. You can subscribe too:
€ 18 for six months / € 25 a year (that’s less than € 0.50 per issue!). More info can be found at www.chessvibes.com/openings .
© 2009 ChessVibes. Copyright exists in all original material published by ChessVibes. Any copying or distribution (reproduction, via print, electronic format, or in any form whatsoever), as
well as posting on the web, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
3 of 3
788960157.037.png 788960157.038.png 788960157.039.png 788960157.040.png 788960157.041.png 788960157.042.png 788960157.043.png 788960157.044.png 788960157.045.png 788960157.046.png 788960157.047.png 788960157.048.png 788960157.049.png 788960157.050.png 788960157.052.png 788960157.053.png 788960157.054.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin