CVO_016.pdf

(904 KB) Pobierz
No. 16, April 22, 2009
OPENINGS
WHAT’S HOT AND WHAT’S NOT?
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+LWQKVL-TR0
9+P+NZPPZPP0
9P+P+-SN-+0
9+-ZPP+-+-0
9-+-ZP-+-+0
9+-SN-+N+-0
9PZP-VLPZPPZP0
9TR-+QMKL+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
The most direct way of
meeting the Chebanenko
By IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris
The Grand Prix Tournament in Nalchik is a typical
modern top-level tournament with many games
starting with 1.e4 e5 trying to equalize, or with 1.d4,
being ‘the ultimate Anti-Petroff/Marshall’, as Alexei
Shirov once put it.
Frequency
WHAT’S HOT?
In Akopian-Kasimdzhanov the main line of the Petroff was tested, but after
mass exchanges it was suddenly White who was in danger of losing with
his weakened queenside. The Marshall was put under heavy pressure this
week, but Black may have found an antidote.
Score
Definitely hot this week is the legendary Zaitsev Variation. Black was fine
against both 12.d5 (Bacrot-Eljanov) and 12.¤g5 ¦e7 13.d5 (Karjakin-
Eljanov; compare CVO 8).
In our Game of the Week we have a closer look at the Chebanenko Slav.
In the diagram position White can repeat moves with 8.¥f4, play 8.£c2
like in the game or go for the other critical move 8.¦c1. In both Eljanov-
Grischuk and Akopian-Leko Black found excellent solutions against
the positional 9.a3 in the Meraner. Leko was also doing fine in his Anti-
Moscow game against Grischuk, so his second Gustafsson must have
done decent work in the Semi-Slav.
More on the Queen s Indian with 5.£a4 and the Ragozin can be found
below. Kamsky s new idea 7.¥g5!? in the Catalan brought him excellent
attacking chances against Gelfand.
Source: Megabase + TWIC, 2500+ only
1.e4 e5 is hot, the rest is not. We do have a look at one of the very few Sicilians, Karjakin-Mamedyarov. Not a single Caro-Kann was played
in Nalchik, only one French (1–0), not to speak of openings like the Scandinavian, Pirc, Modern
or Alekhine.There is more discussion on 1.d4 (with 1.¤f3 and 1.c4 often transposing into 1.d4
lines), but no games with the King’s Indian, Benoni, Volga/Benkö and the Dutch.
WHAT’S NOT?
1 of 4
788960165.051.png 788960165.062.png 788960165.068.png 788960165.069.png 788960165.001.png 788960165.002.png 788960165.003.png 788960165.004.png 788960165.005.png 788960165.006.png 788960165.007.png 788960165.008.png 788960165.009.png 788960165.010.png 788960165.011.png 788960165.012.png 788960165.013.png 788960165.014.png 788960165.015.png 788960165.016.png 788960165.017.png 788960165.018.png 788960165.019.png 788960165.020.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 16, April 22, 2009
A sharp battle in the Chebanenko Slav
“I didn’t spend much time on it before the game, but I prepared seriously for this tournament
and we did investigate this line,” Peter Leko said at the press conference in Nalchik, after his
game against Sergei Karjakin. Let’s have a closer look at this highly interesting draw.
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQ-MK-TR0
9+P+-+-VLP0
9P+P+-+P+0
9+-+-+L+-0
9-+L+-SNN+0
9+-+-+NZP-0
9PZPQSN-ZP-ZP0
9+-MKR+-+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
is easily refuted by 20...£xd2+! 21.¢xd2 b5
22.¤xg7+ ¢f6) 20...¦hxd8 21.¦e2+ ¢d6
22.¢xc2 ¢c5 and Black is doing fine. White s
sharpest possibility is 18.¤e6+ ¥xe6 19.¥xe6
¤xf2! 20.¦xd2 ¥h6 21.¦f1 ¥xd2+ 22.¤xd2
£d4 23.£c4 £e3 24.£b4+ ¢g7 25.£e7+
¢h6 26.£h4+ and White has to accept that he
doesn t have more than a perpetual (see the
PGN for a more extensive analysis).
18...¥xd3 19.£xd2 ¥h6!
Important to keep the white pieces in check.
20.¦he1
The alternatives don t promise White much
either: 20.¤e6+? ¢g8; 20.h3? £d6!; 20.£c3 £f6
or 20.¤e1 ¢g7 21.¤exd3 ¦e8 22.£b4 £e7.
20...£d6!
A strong move, threatening to play 21...£c5 and
thus forcing White to exchange the £s.
21.£xd3 £xd3 22.¦xd3 ¦g8!
An accurate move, which keeps the balance.
23.¦d7
23.¢c2 ¥xf4 24.¦d4 ¥e5 25.¦xg4 ¥f6=
23...¦g7 24.¦xg7 ¢xg7 25.¦e7+ ¢g8 26.¦xb7
¦f8
After an exciting opening battle Black has
managed to create counterplay and easily
makes a draw.
27.h4 ¥xf4+ 28.gxf4 ¦xf4 29.¤g5 ¦xf2
30.¦xh7 ¤e5 31.¦b7 ¦h2 32.a3 a5 33.b4
axb4 34.axb4 ¦xh4 35.b5 cxb5 36.¦xb5
¤f7 37.¦b8+ ¢g7 38.¦b7 ¦h1+ 39.¢d2 ¦f1
40.¢e2 ½–½
GAME OF THE WEEK
Leko, P (2751) - Karjakin, S (2721)
4th FIDE GP Nalchik, April 18, 2009
D15, Chebanenko Slav, 5.c5
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+LWQ-+-TR0
9+P+-+KVLP0
9P+P+-+P+0
9+-SNP+-+-0
9-+-+P+N+0
9+-SN-+NZP-0
9PZPQVL-ZP-ZP0
9TR-+-MKL+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
14.¤xd5N
The first new move, but it seems that Karjakin
already had a closer look at it before the
game! 14.¥g2 ¥xc3! (a strong improvement
over 14...¦e8 which was played in Sargissian-
Laznicka, Moscow 2007) 15.¥xc3 dxe4 16.¥xh8
¤d3+ 17.¢f1 exf3 18.¥xf3 ¤gxf2 19.£b3+ ¢e7
20.¥g7 ¥h3+ 21.¥g2 £d7 yielded Black some
initiative in Ivanchuk-Bacrot, Heraklio 2007
while 14.h3 ¤f6 15.¤g5+ ¢g8 16.¥e3 was
Aronian-Bacrot, Mainz rapid 2007 and now
16...£a5! looks fine for Black.
14...¤xe4 15.¤f4 ¤xd2!
The correct decision to eliminate the bishop
immediately. Inferior would be 15...¥f5 16.£b3+
¢f8 17.0–0–0.
16.0–0–0 ¥f5 17.¥c4+
17.£c5? ¤xf3 18.¦xd8 ¦hxd8 19.¥c4+ ¢f6 and
Black s pieces are stronger than the £.
17...¢f8
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤f3 ¤f6 4.¤c3 a6
This is the legendary Chebanenko Slav. The
original idea is to develop ¥c8 without giving up
the stronghold on d5.
5.c5
This is the most direct approach to punish Black
for weakening the b6-square. In earlier rounds the
other two main lines were tested: 5.a4 e6 6.g3!?
dxc4 7.¥g2 c5 8.dxc5 £xd1+ 9.¤xd1 (this line has
caused Black some problems in recent games,
but Karjakin comes up with a fresh new idea)
9...¥d7!? 10.¤e5 ¤c6 11.¤xc6 ¥xc6 12.¥xc6+
bxc6 13.¥d2 ¤e4 14.¦c1 ¤xd2 15.¢xd2 0–0–0+
16.¢e3 ¥xc5+ 17.¢f3 ¦d5!= Kasimdzhanov-
Karjakin, Nalchik 2009 and 5.e3 b5 6.b3 ¥g4
7.¥d2 ¤bd7 8.h3 ¥xf3 9.£xf3 b4 10.¤a4
e5 11.£d1 ¤e4 12.¥d3 ¤xd2 13.£xd2 exd4
14.0–0! ¥e7 15.cxd5 cxd5 16.¥f5 ¦b8? (16...¤b6)
17.£xd4 ¤f6 18.¦ac1 0–0 19.¦c6± Alekseev-
Svidler, Nalchik 2009.
5...¤bd7 6.¥f4 ¤h5 7.¥d2 ¤hf6 8.£c2
8.¥f4 just repeats moves but 8.¦c1 is the other
critical option, which has been popularized
by Topalov and his second Vallejo: 8...g6
9.h3 £c7 10.g3 ¥g7 11.¥f4 £d8 12.¥g2 and
in the stem game Topalov-Kamsky, Sofia
2006, White used his trademark exchange
sacrifice (¦xe6!) to gain the initiave.
8...g6
The most common move. After other moves Black
has difficulties to equalize: 8...e5?! 9.dxe5 ¤g4
10.¤a4 is considered to be better for White, or
8...£c7 9.e4 e5 10.exd5 cxd5 11.b4 ¥e7 12.¥e2
0–0 13.0–0 e4 14.¤e1² Alekseev-Bacrot, Biel
2008.
9.g3 e5!
From this point on it becomes very concrete.
10.dxe5 ¤g4 11.e6 ¤xc5 12.exf7+ ¢xf7 13.e4
White must try to make use of the vulnerable
position of Black s king, before Black can
stabilize the situation in the centre. 13.b4?! ¥f5!
13...¥g7
(diagram)
A critical position has arisen, but it seems to us
that White has no more than a draw here.
18.¥d3
After exchanging £s, Black has not so much
to worry about 18.¦xd2 because of 18....¥xc2
19.¤e6+ ¢e7 20.¤xd8 (the beautiful 20.¦e1?
LEKO - KARJAKIN
2 of 4
788960165.021.png 788960165.022.png 788960165.023.png 788960165.024.png 788960165.025.png 788960165.026.png 788960165.027.png 788960165.028.png 788960165.029.png 788960165.030.png 788960165.031.png 788960165.032.png 788960165.033.png 788960165.034.png 788960165.035.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 16, April 22, 2009
THIS WEEK’S HARVEST
Ruy Lopez, Marshall
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+-TRK+0
9+-+L+PZPP0
9P+PVL-+-+0
9+P+N+Q+-0
9-+-ZP-+-+0
9+LZP-+-ZP-0
9PZP-+-ZP-ZP0
9TRNVL-TRQMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4 ¤f6 5.0–0 ¥e7 6.¦e1 b5 7.¥b3 0–08.c3 d59.exd5 ¤xd5
10.¤xe5 ¤xe5 11.¦xe5 c6 12.d4 ¥d6 13.¦e1 £h4 14.g3 £h3 15.£e2 ¥d7 16.£f1 £f5
While the Petroff is still the Petroff, the Marshall has been going through some rough times lately. First of all
there is the new Anti-Marshall idea 8.a4 b4 9.d4!? which we talked about in CVO 12. Back then Aronian was
lucky to escape against Carlsen, but this time around, against Karjakin, he did lose. We believe Black should
still be fine in this line, but it remains a very practical choice for White.
The best way to refute a gambit is still by accepting it and in Kamsky-Bacrot White was very close to just
doing that, using the Volokitin line 15.£e2 and 16.£f1 we discussed in CVO 11. A typical Marshall ending was
reached, in which Black finds it increasingly difficult to hold the balance. That s why in Alekseev-Aronian Black
kept the queens on the board with the new 16...£f5!?. In comparison with 16...£h5 the black h-pawn is able
to join the attack.
Sicilian Paulsen/Taimanov
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+LWQKVLNTR0
9+-+-+PZPP0
9P+P+P+-+0
9+-+P+-+-0
9-+-+P+-+0
9+-SN-+-WQ-0
9PZPP+-ZPPZP0
9TR-VL-MKL+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤c6 5.¤c3 a6 6.¤xc6 bxc6 7.£d3 d5 8.£g3
The Sicilian Paulsen/Taimanov hybrid line with 4...¤c6 and 5...a6 can be answered in many ways, but 6.¤xc6
bxc6 seems to be the most critical course. Now White in the high majority of cases goes for 7.¥d3 d5 8.0–0 ¤f6
9.¦e1 or the currently fashionable 9.£f3!?. Another option is the tricky 7.e5!?, which should be theoretically fine
for Black, as Kasparov did play it in a simul but not in a tournament game.
Karjakin chose a third path against Mamedyarov with the seldomly played 7.£d3 followed by the novelty 8.£g3!?.
This queen manoeuvre makes a very fresh and dynamic impression. Possibly his new coach and Kasparov s
former second Yuri Dokhoian has something to do with it.
White sacrificed a pawn and castled queenside to enjoy a nice initiative. Mamedyarov proved to be a tough
defender though and managed to keep the draw. Possible improvements are 15.¥f3!? (Arne Moll) and 16.¤e4!?
(Sergey Shipov).
Queen s Indian, 5. £ a4
XIIIIIIIIY
9RSN-TR-+K+0
9ZPL+-VLPZPP0
9-WQ-ZPPSN-+0
9+-ZP-+-+-0
9Q+P+-VL-+0
9+-SN-+NZP-0
9PZP-TRPZPLZP0
9+-+R+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 b6 4.g3 ¥a6 5.£a4 ¥b7 6.¥g2 c5 7.dxc5 bxc5
8.0–0 ¥e7 9.¤c3 0–0 10.¥f4 £b6 11.¦fd1 ¦d8 12.¦d2 d6 13.¦ad1
So far during the first week of the GP in Nalchik we have seen only two Queen s Indians. In both games White
played the solid 5.£a4 instead of the more topical 5.£c2. The position after 13.¦ad1 is an important tabiya for
this line, which is characterized by White s pressure along the d-file, while Black usually gets play on the b-file. In
the 4th round, after 13...a6 Gelfand came up with the new 14.g4!?, making use of his advantage in development.
After a series of very precise moves, Gelfand missed an excellent chance to convert his advantage. Instead of
13...a6, coincidentally on the same day, the more precise 13...¤e8 was played by Akopian against Mamedyarov.
The Azeri deviated with 16.g4 from the game Gustafsson-Leko, but couldn t really break the balance after
Akopian s strong 18...f5. Conclusion: 13...¤e8 seems to be doing fine for Black and it s up to White to show new
ideas to keep the variation alive!
Ragozin
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+LWQK+-TR0
9ZPP+N+PZPP0
9-+-+-SN-+0
9+-+P+-VL-0
9-+PZP-+-+0
9ZP-WQ-+N+-0
9-ZP-+PZPPZP0
9TR-+-MKL+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 d5 4.¤c3 ¤bd7 5.¥g5 ¥b4 6.£b3 c5 7.cxd5 exd5 8.a3 ¥xc3+ 9.£xc3 c4
The Ragozin variation has always been favoured by players who don t just play the game to equalize with Black.
The tension in the centre gives both sides plenty of possibilities and guarantees an interesting strategical battle,
as in Alekseev-Eljanov. In this specific line, Ragozin-expert Eljanov came up with the strong novelty 12...£e8!,
stepping out of the annoying pin and preparing the advance of his £-side pawns.
Black s unfortunate loss had nothing to do with the outcome of the opening, since Eljanov wanted to force
matters on the £-side too quickly. A serious improvement would have been 20...¥d7.
In recent times Black is doing quite well in the main variation of the Ragozin and it explains why one of the best
opening theoreticians in the world, Boris Gelfand, deviated from the main paths in this opening. His choice to
play with a hanging pawns centre was purely a practical one, since objective evualation of the position says
Black is fine there.
3 of 4
788960165.036.png 788960165.037.png 788960165.038.png 788960165.039.png 788960165.040.png 788960165.041.png 788960165.042.png 788960165.043.png 788960165.044.png 788960165.045.png 788960165.046.png 788960165.047.png 788960165.048.png 788960165.049.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 16, April 22, 2009
OPENING EXPERT
Who: Rustam Kasimdzhanov
Born: December 5, 1979
Nationality: Uzbekistan
Rating: 2695
Expertise: Various openings, lately sharp openings like the Dragon Sicilian
Why: The former FIDE World Champion and current second of Anand has
a broad repertoire, switching from hypersharp openings like Dragon
and Anti-Moscow to positional Queen’s Gambit lines. Generally, in our
opinion, the gifted Uzbek feels best at home in dynamic unbalanced
positions where he is often able to outplay his opponent, thanks to his
dynamic sense for the game.
Key game: Ivanchuk - Kasimdzhanov , 4th FIDE GP Nalchik RUS (5), 19.04.2009
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQ-TRK+0
9ZPP+-+-ZPP0
9-+N+PSN-+0
9+-+P+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9ZP-SN-ZP-+-0
9QZP-+-ZPPZP0
9TR-+-MKL+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
of Ivanchuk s pieces. White is in big trouble now.
23.¤a2
23.exd4 ¤xd4 24.£d1 (24.¦xd4 £xf2+ 25.¢h1
£xf1+) 24...¤df3+ 25.gxf3 ¤xf3+ 26.¢h1 £f4
wins and so does 23.¤e4 ¤a5 24.£d1 ¦xc1
25.£xc1 ¤b3.
23...¤g4 24.¦dc2 dxe3 25.fxe3 ¤a5 0–1
Here White resigned because wherever the
White queen goes, Black will play 26...¦xc2
27.£xc2 £xf1+ 28.¦xf1 ¦xf1+ 29.¢xf1 ¤xe3+
winning a piece.
1.c4 e6 2.¤c3 d5 3.d4 ¥e7 4.cxd5 exd5 5.¥f4
¤f6 6.e3 ¥f5 7.£b3 ¤c6 8.a3 ¤a5 9.£a2 0–0
10.¤f3 c5 11.dxc5 ¥xc5 12.¥e5
12.¦d1 ¥c2 13.¦d2 ¥b3 14.£b1 ¦c8 15.¥e5
¥d6 16.¥xd6 £xd6 17.¥e2 ¥c4 was fine
for Black in Sasikiran-Ponomariov, Khanty
Mansiysk 2007.
12...¥e6 13.¥d4 ¥xd4 14.¤xd4 ¤c6 15.¤xe6
fxe6
(diagram)
This is a typical unbalanced position to
which we refered to in the introduction. The
asymmetrical pawn-formation and the ¤
against ¥ gives Black something to play for.
16.¥e2 £e7 17.0–0 ¦ac8 18.¦ac1 ¢h8
19.¦fd1 ¤d7 20.¦d2 ¤de5 21.£b3?!
21.b4 would be more in the spirit of the game.
21...£f7 22.¥f1?
22.f3 with about a level game, but absolutely
not worse for Black.
22...d4!
Immediately exploiting the unlucky placement
Although this game was extremely short for
such high-class players, we think it perfectly
shows Kasimdzhanov s strength. When he can
enter a position where both sides have their
own trumps, Kasim is extremely alert to punish
his opponent for the slightest inaccuracy!
www.chessvibes.com/openings
ChessVibes Openings is a weekly PDF magazine that covers the latest news on chess openings. Which openings are hot in top level chess?
Which are not? Editors IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris keep you updated once a week! Singles issues cost € 1. You can subscribe too:
€ 18 for six months / € 25 a year (that’s less than € 0.50 per issue!). More info can be found at www.chessvibes.com/openings .
© 2009 ChessVibes. Copyright exists in all original material published by ChessVibes. Any copying or distribution (reproduction, via print, electronic format, or in any form whatsoever), as
well as posting on the web, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
4 of 4
788960165.050.png 788960165.052.png 788960165.053.png 788960165.054.png 788960165.055.png 788960165.056.png 788960165.057.png 788960165.058.png 788960165.059.png 788960165.060.png 788960165.061.png 788960165.063.png 788960165.064.png 788960165.065.png 788960165.066.png 788960165.067.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin