Understanding the Labyrinth as Transformative Site Symbol and Technology by Vanessa Compton (2007).pdf

(6529 KB) Pobierz
Microsoft Word - Understanding the Labyrinth as Transformative Site, Symbol, and Technology 08.doc
Understanding the Labyrinth
as transformative site, symbol, and technology:
An arts-informed inquiry
Vanessa Compton
A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements
for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Department of Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the
University of Toronto
© Copyright by Vanessa Compton, 2007
ABSTRACT
The unicursal labyrinth was first inlayed in the pavement of the Cathedral of Notre Dame de
Chartres in France in 1200 CE, coincident with the flowering of the School of Chartres,
where the Ars Liberales curriculum formalised dialectic inquiry, technologies of the
imagination, and recursive spiritual development. Reclaimed in recent years for walking
meditation, the labyrinth functions, in the context of post-structural, holistic and aesthetic
education, as a site of experiential learning and a technology for guiding the imagination into
transformative patterns of thought. Its image symbolizes the order-versus-confusion binary
characteristic of the integrative processes of personal development.
This research project focuses on understandings drawn from existing literature on the
historical, mythological, and mathematical labyrinth, the accounts of individual seekers and
practitioners, and the author’s personal experience from five years as labyrinth “keeper” in an
urban parish church in Canada. Three personal essays document this involvement with the
labyrinth from the dramatic first encounter, through intellectual quest and personal
pilgrimage, to responsibility for installation and maintenance as public sacred art in a host
community. The inquiry includes an extensive literature review of the historical site and the
many avenues of approach to understanding the interaction between place, identity, and
learning that occurs in the labyrinth .
Grounded in hermeneutic aesthetics and the methods of auto-ethnography,
phenomenology and arts-based research, the inquiry investigates the connection between this
ancient, mathematically significant site, the experience of reflective engagement with it, and
contemporary interpretations of pilgrimage conceptualised as intentional seeking in the
developmental process of self. Implications for education lie both in the labyrinth’s symbolic
function as a public art form demarcating and validating ritual space for care of the self, and
in its capacity to activate the incubation of individual and collective imagination, bring about
shifts in perception, restore personal equilibrium and perspective, and access tacit knowledge
and inner wisdom. The medieval designers intended that users experience the characteristic
sense of integrated consciousness and heightened imaginative function, a heritage that is to
be welcomed at this historical juncture.
ii
GRATITUDE
I have been blessed in this lifetime with great teachers, wise friends, and fine companions
who have illuminated the Path through their gifts of witness, storytelling, insight and
example.
This thesis would not exist at all if it weren’t for the work of the Reverend Dr. Lauren
Artress. Her untiring effort to explore and articulate with humour, generosity, and wisdom a
planetary vision of the labyrinth — and along the way showing what a difference one person
can make in this world — has been an inspiration for which I am very grateful.
I owe much to the Reverend Patrick Doran, brother-in-spirit and comrade of countless
“Benedictine” hours maintaining the St. Paul’s Labyrinth, who taught me most of what I
know about pilgrimage, mission, and service.
I extend sincere gratitude to the members of my doctoral thesis committee, my supervisor
Dr. Jack Miller, Professor David Booth, and Dr. Linda Cameron, for their commitment of
time and energy, and for providing an incomparable model of collegiality and intellectual
support. I would like to thank also to the Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning
at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto for its
continuous financial support within the department and through the Ontario Graduate Studies
scholarship program. Thanks also go to Margaret Brennan and Mary MacDonell in Student
Services for their patience over the years of administering these funds.
Much appreciation goes to these generous friends: Mary Ann O’Connor, for careful
reading and commentary; McEvoy Galbreath, in whose company every step lands on sacred
ground; and Michael Fletcher, for cheerleading, spreadsheets, and dinner.
Last, but not least, I wish to say “Thank you, kids,” to Selena, Aretha, and Nicholas
Black, for your energy, optimism, and faith wherein lies the hope of this emerging world.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... ii
Gratitude .................................................................................................................................. iii
Table of Contents..................................................................................................................... iv
Preface....................................................................................................................................... v
Illustrations ............................................................................................................................. vii
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................... 1
2. Objectives of the study.......................................................................................................... 5
3. Method .................................................................................................................................. 7
4. Theoretical orientation ........................................................................................................ 13
5. Literature review................................................................................................................. 19
6. Understanding the Labyrinth .............................................................................................. 33
7. The Labyrinth as Laboratory .............................................................................................. 53
Thread: An essay about origins + labyrinthine learning .................................................... 63
Cathedral: A reflection on pilgrimage and hermeneutics .................................................. 90
Parish: An essay about coming Home ............................................................................. 145
8. Implications for education ................................................................................................ 174
Appendix 1............................................................................................................................ 189
Appendix 2............................................................................................................................ 191
Appendix 3............................................................................................................................ 193
Appendix 4............................................................................................................................ 194
Appendix 5............................................................................................................................ 195
Appendix 6............................................................................................................................ 196
Appendix 7............................................................................................................................ 201
Appendix 8............................................................................................................................ 202
Appendix 9............................................................................................................................ 224
Appendix 10.......................................................................................................................... 226
Appendix 11.......................................................................................................................... 228
Acknowledgments and Photo Credits................................................................................... 230
Bibliography ......................................................................................................................... 232
iv
PREFACE
The eleven circuit Chartres labyrinth
I began exploring the labyrinth in 1997 due to an incident that occurred in an undergraduate
religious studies course on sacred places. For my class presentation, I had chosen as my topic
the unicursal (single path) labyrinth, about which I knew nothing. Using a pattern I found on
the Internet, the class laid out a seven-circuit labyrinth in tape on the floor. Then we all
walked through it together. I assumed that, because we were engaged in purely “intellectual”
pursuits, the information concerning ritual process in the material I had gathered about the
labyrinth was entirely theoretical, and not applicable to a classroom situation. The
presentation went well: the class was cooperative and the labyrinth looked beautiful. We had
fun, except for one of the older students who complained of feeling crowded and nauseous.
I had underestimated the power of experiential learning. The following week, this student
described the aftermath of the presentation. A violent incident at home over the weekend had
triggered the insight that her marriage was a labyrinth, with her abusive husband as the
Minotaur at the centre! She decided to institutionalize him for previously diagnosed early
stage Alzheimer’s disease and had set the process in motion the very same day, to the great
relief of their adult children.
The story she recounted of revelation and personal transformation was so impressive that
I felt compelled to learn all I could about this phenomenon (Compton, 2002). How could
such an innocent, even clueless, undertaking could have such a profound effect? It did not
seem to matter whether participants believed in the power of the labyrinth or that they even
be aware of it. That suggested that the pattern was intentionally planned to have a particular
effect—at least the one I had witnessed (and what did that signify, in the world of scholarly
synchronicity?)— and perhaps others as well. This unleashed a cascade of questions: Who
had designed this thing? What were they thinking? What could we learn from it? Most
important, were there implications for education in such a life-altering site?
v
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin