Atlantis and Hyperborea - An Inquiry Into the Cyclical Mysteries by Charles Upton.pdf

(295 KB) Pobierz
6304840 UNPDF
Religioperennis.org
ATLANTIS AND HYPERBOREA
An Inquiry into the Cyclical Mysteries
With a Reconsideration of the René Guénon’s Rendition of the Cycle of
Manifestation in Traditional Forms and Cosmic Cycles, The King of the World, and The
Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times
by Charles Upton
Now I a fourfold vision see
And a fourfold vision is given to me
Tis fourfold in my supreme delight
And three fold in soft Beulas night
And twofold Always. May God us keep
From Single vision & Newton’s sleep.
~ ~ William Blake,
from a letter to Thomas Butts
René Guénon and his followers, notably Frithjof Schuon and Martin Lings, take
as one of their central cosmological principles that cosmic manifestation is entropic, not
evolutionary: whatever has come into outer manifestation from the Unseen World has
already begun to die. Thus the traditional prophesies of the end of “this world” are not the
products of “clairvoyance,” arbitrary myth or random visionary experience, nor are they
projections or extrapolations based on past events or present conditions. Rather, they are
based upon a cosmological context: the doctrine of the “cycle of manifestation,” called by
the Hindus the Manvantara or Mahayuga , composed of four yugas or world-ages.
Guénon and those influenced by him consider the Hindu picture of this cycle to be the
most intelligible and complete, though a similar notion also appears in Greco-Roman
mythology. (The idea of a cycle-of-manifestation may be found the Abrahamic religions
as well, but here the doctrine is less explicit, more veiled in symbolism and allegory.)
1
Religioperennis.org
The Greek word for such a cycle-of-manifestation is aion , which is translatable
either as “world” or as “age.” When Jesus says “behold I am with you always, even to the
consummation of the world” or (according to a different translation) “of the age”, he is
positing the reality of such a cycle. It is interesting that aion can be translated into
English by either a spacial word (“world”) or a temporal one (“age”). The reason for this
is that aion denotes precisely a spacio-temporal reality. We visualize a year spacially as a
cycle of four seasons, as we visualize a twelve-hour period in terms of the circular dial of
a clock. Time is not purely linear; it is also cyclical, periodically returning to analogous
(though not strictly identical) points: dawn, noon, dusk, midnight, the vernal equinox, the
summer solstice, the autumnal equinox, the winter solstice. Anything that orbits, from the
spinning of an electron around an atomic nucleus, to the wheeling of a galaxy, to
(perhaps) the birth and death of the universe (a word that means “one turn”) -anything
that exhibits periodic motion -- is an example of a cycle in this sense. The word aion
denotes the spacio-temporal reality of such a cycle – a cycle of time considered sub
specie aeternitatis as a single quasi-spacial form, what the Hindus call the “long body.”
Any form or being that exists in time can also be viewed from the “outside,” from a point
that is relatively eternal in relation to that form, and so seen as a single, “simultaneous”
history of itself, a kind of histomap . The term for this level of reality, in Eastern
Orthodox theology, is aeonian time .
In any given cycle-of-manifestation, an eternal reality “enters” time, moving
from simultaneity toward succession. What is eternally present in synthetic mode is
analyzed temporally, and therefore appears successively; in Plato’s words, “time is the
moving image of Eternity.” But this move from eternity to time does not happen “all at
once.” Though eternity and time are in one sense absolutely discontinuous, necessitating
a radical break, a “fall” or “ascension”, in the passage from one to the other, in another
sense the path from eternity to time moves through a number of stages, passing from the
relatively more eternal toward the relatively more temporal, in the direction of the
“absolutely temporal” – a point which can never be reached, however, since “pure
sequence” would negate form absolutely, in which case there would be nothing to pass
from one sequential phase to another. Manifestation is thus intrinsically entropic. An
2
Religioperennis.org
eternal form “in the mind of God” appears in space and time, and is simultaneously
veiled by its own manifestation. It becomes progressively more subject to history and
contingency -- and when it has consumed the energy of the initial impulse that brought it
into manifest existence, it dissolves. Its dissolution unveils the eternal archetype of that
form, which never entered manifestation – the naked radiance of which initiates the next
cycle of manifestation.
It is in the context of this successive passage from eternity to time, or rather from
aeonian to linear time, that the doctrine of the existence of earlier world-ages – which are
not just earlier points in our own type of historical time -- makes sense. And the kind of
sense it makes also stretches from the relatively eternal to the relatively temporal. Near to
the eternal end of the spectrum, a yuga (the Satya-Yuga or Golden Age) is symbolic; at
the temporal end of the spectrum, a yuga (the Kali-Yuga or Iron Age), touches upon and
embraces history as we understand it. Thus the true significance of the “end of this
world” cannot be grasped without an understanding of both the symbolic and the quasi-
historical aspects of cyclical manifestation, which necessarily includes an understanding
of the quality and meaning of the “prior” states of the cycle, states which from one
perspective are earlier in a temporal sense – given that we recognize that the quality of
time was different in earlier ages – but according to another have “priority” not in a
historical sense, but in an ontological one.
Legends of ancient and mysterious lands, “long ago and far away,” legends of
Agarttha, Shambhala, of the Terrestrial Paradise, the seat of Prester John, Atlantis,
Lemuria, the Mount of the Prophets – stories like these always seem to collect around
profound spiritualities, especially esoteric ones. On one level they are mere “exoticism”
or “spiritual romanticism.” Those who entertain such dreams may never grow beyond
them; they are in danger of letting their spiritual lives be trapped on the level of barren
imagination.
But what of those who never allow themselves to entertain such dreams? Will,
intelligence, sentiment are nothing without Grace – and one of the channels of Grace, at
3
Religioperennis.org
least in the initial stages of the Path, may be the Imagination itself, which Blake called
“an Intellectual Fountain.” In apophatic contemplation (contemplation of God’s
Transcendence, based on the denial of His comparability to anything in the domain of
manifestation), the profane imagination, based on individual fear and desire and its
collective extensions, is negated; God is recognized as an unknowable Essence beyond
all thought and feeling, beyond all name and form. But in cataphatic contemplation (the
contemplation of God’s Immanence, the recognition that He is in a sense comparable to
all things, since without His Reality, no thing would be), Divine Imagination is born.
Divine Imagination is objective Imagination, manifesting as the Imaginal Plane or alam
al-mithal, the place where the “image-exemplars” of Divine Realities appear as
conscious, living symbols – as they do, on another level, in material reality.
So the mythopoetic lore of imaginal worlds, manifest on the psychic or
intermediary plane, may have a valid and spiritually operative relationship to the world
of metaphysical Principles, the intelligible plane – and this is definitely true of the
“cyclical mysteries,” the legends of earlier aeons which were (and are ) less constricted,
less materialized than the world we presently inhabit. To project our contemporary
concept of linear historical time backwards into earlier world ages is problematic, since
different ages have different essential qualities; to consider previous yugas to be nothing
more than earlier historical periods as we presently define them is to blind ourselves to
these qualities. Yet earlier worlds are not mere allegories of higher ontological levels;
they were (and are) real manifested worlds – formal worlds, not transformal intelligible
Principles.
Traditional cosmology sees the present world and the present generation as
“descended” from the heroes and fathers of earlier ages who were ontologically more
exalted than we are. They were taller than we are, lived for hundreds of years, were free
from disease, etc. And these heroes, ancient kings, fathers, patriarchs or demigods were
in turn descended from the gods, the celestial paradises, then from the intelligible
Principles, and ultimately from the Creator Himself. God-as-Creator, in other words, was
almost universally viewed in traditional cosmologies as the First Ancestor – literally
4
Religioperennis.org
“God the Father.” And this hierarchicalization of history is also clearly discernable in the
cyclical lore of many nations and religions – the Hindus, the Greco-Romans, the Mayans,
the Hopi, the Lakota, the Australian Aborigines, and many African tribes. The “earlier” a
world-age is, according to these cosmologies, the more clearly it appears as eternal level
of Being; the “later” an age is, the more closely it resembles our idea of an historical
period. So the “trajectory” of a given cycle-of-manifestation is not a straight line, or even
a circle, but rather a helix. Turning three times, it descends through four levels; and when
it returns to its compass-point of origin for the third time – in other words, when it
reaches its nadir -- it undergoes a “pole shift” from accelerating history to motionless
simultaneity; the perspective changes from that of the last grains of sand speeding
through the neck of the hourglass to the nearly motionless mass of sand below it, after
which the glass is inverted: nadir becomes zenith. In Guénon’s words, from The Reign of
Quantity and the Signs of the Times , pp. 159-160:
It is sometimes said, doubtless without any understanding of the real
reason, that today men live faster than in the past, and this is literally true.... If
carried to an extreme limit the contraction of time would in the end reduce it to a
single instant, and then duration would really have ceased to exist, for it is evident
that there can no longer be any succession within the instant. Thus it is that "time
the devourer ends by devouring itself", in such a way that, at the "end of the
world", that is to say at the extreme limit of cyclical manifestation, "there will be
no more time"; this is also why it is said that "death is the last being to die", for
wherever there is no succession of any kind, death is no longer possible. As soon
as succession has come to an end, or, in symbolic terms, "the wheel has ceased to
turn", all that exists cannot but be in perfect simultaneity; and this can also be
expressed by saying that "time has changed into space". Thus a "reversal" takes
place at the last, to the disadvantage of time and the advantage of space: at the
very moment when time seemed on the point of finally devouring space, space in
its turn absorbs time….
5
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin