horsemanship.pdf

(91 KB) Pobierz
On
Horsemanship
____________________
Xenophon
Translation by H. G. Dakyns
This classical e-book and more can be found at
http://www.textkit.com
Claiming to have attained some proficiency in
horsemanship[1] ourselves, as the result of long experience in the
field, our wish is to explain, for the benefit of our younger friends,
what we conceive to be the most correct method of dealing with
horses.
[1] Lit. "Since, through the accident of having for a long time
'ridden' ourselves, we believe we have become proficients in
horsemanship, we wish to show to our younger friends how, as we
conceive the matter, they will proceed most correctly in dealing
with horses." {ippeuein} in the case of Xenophon = serve as a
{ippeus}, whether technically as an Athenian "knight" or more
particularly in reference to his organisation of a troop of cavalry
during "the retreat" ("Anab." III. iii. 8-20), and, as is commonly
believed, while serving under Agesilaus ("Hell." III. iv. 14) in
Asia, 396, 395 B.C.
There is, it is true, a treatise on horsemanship written by Simon,
the same who dedicated the bronze horse near the Eleusinion in
Athens[2] with a representation of his exploits engraved in relief on
the pedestal.[3] But we shall not on that account expunge from
our treatise any conclusions in which we happen to agree with that
author; on the contrary we shall hand them on with still greater
pleasure to our friends, in the belief that we shall only gain in
authority from the fact that so great an expert in horsemanship held
similar views to our own; whilst with regard to matters omitted in
his treatise, we shall endeavour to supply them.
[2] L. Dind. [in Athens]. The Eleusinion. For the position of this
sanctuary of Demeter and Kore see Leake, "Top. of Athens," i. p.
296 foll. For Simon see Sauppe, vol. v. Praef. to "de R. E." p.
230; L. Dind. Praef. "Xen. Opusc." p. xx.; Dr. Morris H. Morgan,
"The Art of Horsemanship by Xenophon," p. 119 foll. A fragment
of the work referred to, {peri eidous kai ekloges ippon}, exists.
The MS. is in the library of Emmanual Coll. Cant. It so happens
that one of the hipparchs (?) appealed to by Demosthenes in
Arist. "Knights," 242,
{andres ippes, paragenesthe nun o kairos, o Simon, o Panaiti, ouk
elate pros to dexion keras};
bears the name.
[3] Lit. "and carved on the pedestal a representation of his own
performances."
As our first topic we shall deal with the question, how a man may
best avoid being cheated in the purchase of a horse.
Take the case of a foal as yet unbroken: it is plain that our
scrutiny must begin with the body; an animal that has never yet
been mounted can but present the vaguest indications of spirit.
Confining ourselves therefore to the body, the first point to
examine, we maintain, will be the feet. Just as a house would be of
little use, however beautiful its upper stories, if the underlying
foundations were not what they ought to be, so there is little use to
be extracted from a horse, and in particular a war-horse,[4] if
unsound in his feet, however excellent his other points; since he
could not turn a single one of them to good account.[5]
[4] Or, "and that a charger, we will suppose." For the simile see
"Mem." III. i. 7.
[5] Cf. Hor. "Sat." I. ii. 86:
regibus hic mos est: ubi equos mercantur, opertos inspiciunt, ne, si
facies, ut saepe, decora molli fulta pede est, emptorem inducat
hiantem, quod pulchrae clunes, breve quod caput, ardua cervix.
and see Virg. "Georg." iii. 72 foll.
In testing the feet the first thing to examine will be the
horny portion of the hoof. For soundness of foot a thick horn is far
better than a thin. Again it is important to notice whether the hoofs
are high both before and behind, or flat to the ground; for a high
hoof keeps the "frog,"[6] as it is called, well off the ground;
whereas a low hoof treads equally with the stoutest and softest part
of the foot alike, the gait resembling that of a bandy-legged man.[7]
"You may tell a good foot clearly by the ring," says Simon
happily;[8] for the hollow hoof rings like a cymbal against the solid
earth.[9]
[6] Lit. "the swallow."
[7] Al. "a knock-kneed person." See Stonehenge, "The Horse" (ed.
1892), pp. 3, 9.
[8] Or, "and he is right."
[9] Cf. Virg. "Georg." iii. 88; Hor. "Epod." xvi. 12.
And now that we have begun with the feet, let us ascend from
this point to the rest of the body. The bones[10] above the hoof and
below the fetlock must not be too straight, like those of a goat;
through not being properly elastic,[11] legs of this type will jar the
rider, and are more liable to become inflamed. On the other hand,
these bones must not be too low, or else the fetlock will be abraded
or lacerated when the horse is galloped over clods and stones.
[10] i.e. "the pasterns ({mesokunia}) and the coffin should be
'sloping.'"
[11] Or, "being too inflexible." Lit. "giving blow for blow, overuch
like anvil to hammer."
The bones of the shanks[12] ought to be thick, being as they are
the columns on which the body rests; thick in themselves, that is,
not puffed out with veins or flesh; or else in riding over hard
ground they will inevitably be surcharged with blood, and varicose
conditions be set up,[13] the legs becoming thick and puffy, whilst
the skin recedes; and with this loosening of the skin the back
sinew[14] is very apt to start and render the horse lame.
[12] i.e. "the metacarpals and metatarsals."
[13] Or, "and become varicose, with the result that the shanks
swell whilst the skin recedes from the bone."
[14] Or, "suspensory ligament"? Possibly Xenophon's anatomy is
wrong, and he mistook the back sinew for a bone like the fibula.
The part in question might intelligibly enough, if not technically,
be termed {perone}, being of the brooch-pin order.
If the young horse in walking bends his knees flexibly, you may
safely conjecture that when he comes to be ridden he will have
flexible legs, since the quality of suppleness invariably increases
with age.[15] Supple knees are highly esteemed and with good
reason, rendering as they do the horse less liable to stumble or
break down from fatigue than those of stiffer build.
[15] Lit. "all horses bend their legs more flexibly as time
advances."
Coming to the thighs below the shoulder-blades,[16] or arms, these
if thick and muscular present a stronger and handsomer appearance,
just as in the case of a human being. Again, a comparatively broad
chest is better alike for strength and beauty, and better adapted to
carry the legs well asunder, so that they will not overlap and
interfere with one another. Again, the neck should not be set on
dropping forward from the chest, like a boar's, but, like that of a
game-cock rather, it should shoot upwards to the crest, and be
slack[17] along the curvature; whilst the head should be bony and
the jawbone small. In this way the neck will be well in front of the
rider, and the eye will command what lies before the horse's feet. A
horse, moreover, of this build, however spirited, will be least
capable of overmastering the rider,[18] since it is not by arching but
by stretching out his neck and head that a horse endeavours to
assert his power.[19]
[16] Lit. "the thighs below the shoulder-blades" are distinguished
from "the thighs below the tail." They correspond respectively to
our "arms" (i.e. forearms) and "gaskins," and anatomically
speaking = the radius (os brachii) and the tibia.
[17] "Slack towards the flexure" (Stonehenge).
[18] Or, "of forcing the rider's hand and bolting."
[19] Or, "to display violence or run away."
It is important also to observe whether the jaws are soft or hard
on one or other side, since as a rule a horse with unequal jaws[20]
is liable to become hard-mouthed on one side.
[20] Or, "whose bars are not equally sensitive."
Again, a prominent rather than a sunken eye is suggestive
of alertness, and a horse of this type will have a wider range of
vision.
And so of the nostrils: a wide-dilated nostril is at once better than a
contracted one for respiration, and gives the animal a fiercer aspect.
Note how, for instance, when one stallion is enraged
against another, or when his spirit chafes in being ridden,[21] the
nostrils at once become dilated. [21] Or, "in the racecourse or on
the exercising-ground how readily he distends his nostrils."
A comparatively large crest and small ears give a more typical
and horse-like appearance to the head, whilst lofty withers again
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin